Hi all,

in the past, I wrote several mails to this list (and so to Sam) to incooperate several things, fix bugs and so on.

As far as I mostly get no response of other courier-users (which this list is named, not "ask-sam-for-help"), is there just anyone interested in this? Sam disappoints me mostly every time and there are no replys to these threads. Someone could rename "courier-imapd" to "battle- against-oe-and-netscape-imapd" and hits the point. This should not be the destination of courier.

Is anyone out there with my opinion to create a correctly-behaving and flexible imapd or are they gone and lost with other software because of the unusability of courier in a typical environment?

If this is the case, I do have no problems to leave this list as an active member and hack my own, well-behaving imapd based on courier and the many patches which are available 'till now, splitting the development into two, different paths (Sam and me), possibly more (I am not aware of someone who did this before, if: tell me!).

Please, reply to this message and tell what _you_ are thinking about. I do have enough things to do instead twiddling around with Sam and his way of work to get courier become a good software.

I am just in hope that Sam gives up his sights and is going to deliver an allround-usable courier-imapd to the community, which not needs patches for mixed client-environments, which does work like rfc2060 states and has the power as now.