atom feed216 messages in org.apache.wicket.usersRe: Free wicket from component hierar...
FromSent OnAttachments
102 earlier messages
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 7:33 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 7:36 am 
John OwenNov 9, 2010 7:36 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 7:38 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 7:45 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 9, 2010 7:48 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 7:51 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 7:57 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:00 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:04 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 8:05 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:06 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:07 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 8:10 am 
SebastianNov 9, 2010 8:18 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:26 am 
manuelbarziNov 9, 2010 8:31 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:33 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:34 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:36 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:37 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 8:39 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:40 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:46 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 9, 2010 8:46 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:47 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:48 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:49 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:49 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:50 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 9, 2010 8:50 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:53 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:55 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:55 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:56 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:57 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:58 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:58 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:59 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:59 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:03 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:05 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:11 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:13 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:16 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:22 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:25 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:29 am 
SebastianNov 9, 2010 9:29 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:33 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:33 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:38 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:38 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:41 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:42 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:45 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:51 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:00 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:04 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:25 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:29 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:36 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 10:52 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 10:53 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:54 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:59 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 11:02 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 11:08 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 11:10 am 
Michael BrinkmanNov 9, 2010 11:27 am 
Sven MeierNov 9, 2010 12:03 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:15 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:17 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:22 pm 
Sven MeierNov 9, 2010 12:42 pm 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 12:45 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:57 pm 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 12:58 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 1:04 pm 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 12:48 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 1:04 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 1:23 am 
James CarmanNov 10, 2010 4:31 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 5:08 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 10, 2010 6:18 am 
James CarmanNov 10, 2010 6:23 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 10, 2010 8:17 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 10, 2010 8:22 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 10, 2010 8:23 am 
Giannis KoutsoubosJan 14, 2011 8:44 am 
Giannis KoutsoubosJan 18, 2011 1:03 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 18, 2011 1:22 am 
Martin MakundiJan 18, 2011 1:24 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 18, 2011 1:42 am 
Martin MakundiJan 18, 2011 1:45 am 
Martijn DashorstJan 18, 2011 1:51 am 
Martijn DashorstJan 18, 2011 1:54 am 
Jeremy ThomersonJan 18, 2011 12:47 pm 
Martin MakundiJan 19, 2011 1:55 am 
Giannis KoutsoubosJan 20, 2011 7:41 am 
14 later messages
Subject:Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell
From:Martin Makundi (mart@koodaripalvelut.com)
Date:Nov 9, 2010 9:33:01 am
List:org.apache.wicket.users

On the other hand if you only have to do component nesting programmatically in case of functional reasons (like security) your code will probably much cleaner and you'll realize issues like using the wrong parent faster.

+1

Very good point: cleaner code! Finally complex wicket pages will look like their hello-world counterparts.

** Martin

Instead of: myComponent.add(child1) child1.add(child2) child2.add(child3) child2.add(child4) myComponent.setVisible(false / true)

You do: myComponent.add(child1) myComponent.add(child2) myComponent.add(child3) // correct direct parent determined by markup myComponent.add(child4) // correct direct parent determined by markup myComponent.setVisible(false / true)

On 09.11.2010 18:17, James Carman wrote:

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Martin Makundi <mart@koodaripalvelut.com>  wrote:

(You) as a coder will be responsible for opening that can ;] For good and for bad. Not wicket. Nor members of this discussion.

How many times have you done this:

add(new TextField(...))

when you meant to do:

someSubComponent.add(new TextField(..))

With add, you'll get an exception if the ids/hierarchy don't match up.  Now, what if you're queueing instead?  Suppose the user does:

queue(new TextField(...))

which will work perfectly fine, but they meant to do (to enforce "security"):

someSubComponent.queue(new TextField(...))

Now, since security is not enforced the "designer" has the freedom to move stuff around and royally hose things up.