Mark Constable wrote:
On 25 Jan 2008 16:29, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
That's very informative, excellent, thank you.
Hm... looking closer it may be wrong or different than what
I thought it was. In facts, testing it at mine I get this:
wmail-505# cd ..
wmail-506# cd rfc1035
wmail-507# ./testspf -h
Usage: ./testspf mailfrom remoteip remotehost helo me
wmail-508#
wmail-508# ./testspf "post...@bankwest.com.au" "216.82.241.83" "" "" ""
fail: Address does not pass the Sender Policy Framework
wmail-509#
wmail-509#
wmail-509# !!
./testspf "post...@bankwest.com.au" "216.82.241.83" "" "" ""
fail: Address does not pass the Sender Policy Framework
wmail-510# ./testspf "post...@bankwest.com.au" "::ffff:216.82.241.83"
"" "" ""
fail: Address does not pass the Sender Policy Framework
What's wrong? The program queries "nets.messagelabs.com",
i.e. the "%{ir}" macro results in a null string expansion.
After tinkering a bit I applied the attached patch and the same
command line above this time gave a "pass". You may have the same
problem, if it hasn't been already fixed.
--
--- spf.original.c 2006-04-13 01:00:49.000000000 +0200
+++ spf.c 2008-01-26 16:21:19.000000000 +0100
@@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@
** number, but MUST support at least a value of 9.
*/
- if (transformer_count > n)
+ if (transformer_count > n || transformer_count <= 0)
transformer_count=n;
if (transformer_reverse)
9 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] [PATCH] SPF
