atom feed22 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.officeRe: [office] Passwords
FromSent OnAttachments
Patrick DurusauNov 27, 2006 4:51 pm 
David FaureNov 28, 2006 1:07 am 
Daniel CarreraNov 28, 2006 1:40 am.pgp
Florian ReuterNov 28, 2006 2:32 am 
Daniel CarreraNov 28, 2006 2:51 am.pgp
Dave PawsonNov 28, 2006 2:58 am 
Daniel CarreraNov 28, 2006 3:12 am.pgp
Patrick DurusauNov 28, 2006 3:30 am 
Daniel CarreraNov 28, 2006 6:29 am.pgp
Patrick DurusauNov 28, 2006 6:47 am 
Daniel CarreraNov 28, 2006 6:59 am.pgp
robe...@us.ibm.comNov 28, 2006 7:37 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgNov 28, 2006 7:42 am 
Daniel CarreraNov 28, 2006 8:16 am.pgp
Patrick DurusauNov 28, 2006 11:07 am 
Daniel CarreraNov 29, 2006 1:07 am.pgp
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgDec 8, 2006 2:50 am 
Daniel CarreraDec 8, 2006 3:54 am.pgp
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgDec 8, 2006 4:18 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgJan 15, 2007 2:24 am 
Zhi Yu YueJan 15, 2007 6:19 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgJan 15, 2007 6:36 am 
Subject:Re: [office] Passwords
From:David Faure (fau@kde.org)
Date:Nov 28, 2006 1:07:55 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.office

On Tue Nov 28 2006, Patrick Durusau wrote:

Shouldn't encryption of the password be considered as application specific?

This would simply kill interoperability. Why don't we standardize the hash function instead?

-- David Faure, fau@kde.org, sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.koffice.org).