atom feed20 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] Dynamic generation of $0-inc...
FromSent OnAttachments
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 7, 2007 6:54 pm 
Alexandre QuessyFeb 7, 2007 8:34 pm 
Chris McCormickFeb 7, 2007 9:11 pm.pd
Chris McCormickFeb 7, 2007 11:00 pm 
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 7, 2007 11:15 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 7, 2007 11:23 pm 
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 7, 2007 11:33 pm 
PatcoFeb 8, 2007 2:41 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 2:44 am 
PatcoFeb 8, 2007 3:32 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 8, 2007 4:35 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 4:45 am 
SteffenFeb 8, 2007 5:20 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 5:45 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 8, 2007 5:57 am 
SteffenFeb 8, 2007 6:05 am 
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 8, 2007 6:11 am 
hard offFeb 8, 2007 9:12 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 1:31 pm 
hard offFeb 8, 2007 3:18 pm 
Subject:Re: [PD] Dynamic generation of $0-including objects?
From:Patco (mega@yahoo.fr)
Date:Feb 8, 2007 2:41:41 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

Luke Iannini (pd) a écrit :

Hm... I'm not sure if your patch was supposed to "work" or demonstrate my issue, Chris... thanks for making it regardless : ).

Alexandre, not sure what you're suggesting either since [f $0] would output the "value" of $0 rather than the actual characters "$0"

hello, there something I don't understand, why do you absolutely want to get the characters "$0" when it's for 'dynamic patching' at the moment the $0 value is for the current instance of a patch, the target subpatch only need the $0 value, and it doesn't matter if it's the value or the characters, unless this dynamical patching is for building subpatches that will be saved into the current patch, so I don't understand why building dynamically subpatches in patches that will be saved in the current state. Usually, dynamical patching is usefull for attributing provisional states into a patch. Is there another way to use dynamic patching?