I can't find anything in the CCO as well. I wanted to open a TAC case but I
don't have a contract agreement with Cisco.
From: "Michael K. Smith" <mksmith at noanet.net>
Date: Wed 19/01/2005 1:46 PM GMT+08:00
To: Jason Koh <kohtohshyr at pacific.net.sg>,
Marty Adkins <adkins at netcraftsmen.net>, <cisco-nsp at
puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Re: Strange error on Cat65 MSFC
On 1/18/05 7:42 PM, "Jason Koh" <kohtohshyr at pacific.net.sg> wrote:
Oh dear, silly me, forgot to attach it.
Jan 19 11:39:51.362 SGT: %MSFC2-3-MISTRAL_BAD_PAK: Possibly un-encapsulated
packet passed to Mistral: int Vlan119, type 103, stat 0x210048, flags 0x0,
size 77, offset 58, total 2747320927
-Traceback= 4029DBBC 40203954 4010AF98 40922A50 40922AD8 40922C7C 40231DFC
40231DE8
PIM? Is someone (or you) running multicast on that particular VLAN? All of
the Cisco stuff related to MISTRAL errors recommends a TAC case, as does a
Traceback under any circumstances.
Anyone care to share what the MISTRAL ASIC is and or does? I did the usual
poking and prodding around CCO but can't find an architectural reference for
that particular ASIC.
6 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Re: Strange error on Cat65 MSFC
