| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin Wilson | Jan 7, 2003 8:47 am | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 9:08 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 7, 2003 9:14 am | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 9:26 am | |
| Kevin Wilson | Jan 7, 2003 9:33 am | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 9:41 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 7, 2003 10:00 am | |
| Rasputin | Jan 7, 2003 10:55 am | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 12:40 pm | |
| Jason Pyeron | Jan 7, 2003 12:47 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 7, 2003 12:58 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 1:50 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 7:15 am | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 12:54 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 12:55 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 1:03 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 1:34 pm | |
| Gary Gwin | Jan 8, 2003 2:34 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 2:46 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 3:24 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 3:44 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 3:51 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 3:55 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 5:33 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 8, 2003 6:06 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 6:28 pm | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Jan 8, 2003 6:33 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 7:19 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 8, 2003 7:26 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 8, 2003 7:35 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:06 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:11 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:17 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:21 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 8, 2003 11:23 pm | |
| neal | Jan 8, 2003 11:37 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 8, 2003 11:51 pm | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 12:03 am | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Jan 9, 2003 12:08 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 2:31 am | |
| Ralph Einfeldt | Jan 9, 2003 2:41 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 3:51 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 3:53 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 5:22 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 5:33 am | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 9, 2003 10:01 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 10:02 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 11:16 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 11:25 am | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Jan 9, 2003 11:43 am | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 11:47 am | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 12:09 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 12:11 pm | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Jan 9, 2003 12:33 pm | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 1:41 pm | |
| Turner, John | Jan 9, 2003 1:45 pm | |
| Jon Eaves | Jan 9, 2003 2:58 pm | |
| neal | Jan 9, 2003 4:04 pm | |
| Jeffrey Winter | Jan 9, 2003 4:25 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 9, 2003 5:43 pm | |
| Jeffrey Winter | Jan 9, 2003 6:10 pm | |
| Jeffrey Winter | Jan 9, 2003 6:11 pm | |
| Tim Funk | Jan 9, 2003 6:14 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 9, 2003 7:08 pm | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 9, 2003 7:11 pm | |
| Tim Funk | Jan 10, 2003 4:29 am | |
| Jacob Hookom | Jan 10, 2003 6:36 am | |
| Cox, Charlie | Jan 10, 2003 6:47 am | |
| Tim Funk | Jan 10, 2003 6:52 am | |
| AAron nAAs | Jan 10, 2003 7:03 am | |
| Jacob Hookom | Jan 10, 2003 7:06 am | |
| Craig R. McClanahan | Jan 10, 2003 3:53 pm | |
| neal | Jan 19, 2003 10:10 pm |
| Subject: | RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Turner, John (JTur...@AAS.com) | |
| Date: | Jan 8, 2003 7:19:25 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.tomcat.users | |
OK, so what's the rationalization for the 302? Can you shed some light on that?
John
-----Original Message----- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:crai...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:07 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Turner, John wrote:
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 20:33:50 -0500 From: "Turner, John" <JTur...@AAS.com> Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <tomc...@jakarta.apache.org> To: 'Tomcat Users List' <tomc...@jakarta.apache.org> Subject: RE: RewriteRules and Standalone Tomcat
No problem, glad to help. Remember, Tomcat is not a HTTP server. It supports HTTP as a matter of convenience. You can run Tomcat all day long without a HTTP or HTTPS connector, and as far as I know, there is nothing in the spec that says Tomcat has to meet certain requirements for HTTP or HTTPS. CoyoteConnector is HTTP/1.1 compliant, but again, that's more for convenience and compatibility than a design requirement.
Auoting from Servlet Specification, Version 2.3, Section 1.2:
All servlet containers must support HTTP as a protocol for requests and responses, but additional request/response based protocols (such as HTTPS (HTTP over SSL) may be supported. The minimum required version of the HTTP specification that a container must implement is HTTP/1.0. It is strongly suggested that containers implement the HTTP/1.1 specification as well.
So, a servlet container (which is either Tomcat standalone or Tomcat+Apache) *must* support HTTP.
I'm sure the folks on tomcat-dev could shed some more light on it.
Of course, this statement does nothing to resolve the issue of what the right welcome file behavior is -- the HTTP spec is silent about that :-).
John
Craig
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomc...@jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomc...@jakarta.apache.org>
--- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 12/25/2002





