atom feed22 messages in net.java.dev.rococoa.usersRe: BOOL mapping issues
FromSent OnAttachments
Harald KuhrFeb 9, 2010 11:58 am 
Duncan McGregorFeb 9, 2010 12:04 pm 
Harald KuhrFeb 9, 2010 12:27 pm 
Harald KuhrFeb 9, 2010 12:37 pm.java
Duncan McGregorFeb 10, 2010 12:37 am 
Harald KuhrFeb 10, 2010 2:39 am.java
Harald KuhrFeb 17, 2010 7:25 am 
Duncan McGregorFeb 18, 2010 1:56 am 
Andrew ThompsonFeb 18, 2010 6:52 pm 
Harald KuhrFeb 19, 2010 6:49 am 
Harald KuhrFeb 19, 2010 7:23 am 
Harald KuhrFeb 19, 2010 10:37 am 
Harald KuhrFeb 19, 2010 12:13 pm 
Duncan McGregorFeb 19, 2010 2:04 pm 
Harald KuhrFeb 19, 2010 3:06 pm 
Andrew ThompsonFeb 20, 2010 8:02 am 
Harald KuhrFeb 20, 2010 1:12 pm 
Andrew ThompsonFeb 20, 2010 5:22 pm 
Duncan McGregorFeb 21, 2010 2:55 am 
Harald KuhrFeb 21, 2010 8:14 am 
Duncan McGregorFeb 21, 2010 8:40 am 
Duncan McGregorFeb 21, 2010 9:01 am 
Subject:Re: BOOL mapping issues
From:Andrew Thompson (lord@mac.com)
Date:Feb 20, 2010 5:22:16 pm
List:net.java.dev.rococoa.users

On Feb 20, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Harald Kuhr wrote:

Jokes aside.. Do you know if it's always safe to use the mapping I proposed? At
least both bool and BOOL seems to use 1 rather than -1.

I have no explicit knowledge that this is safe, but logically what you did seems
harmless and makes sense. I suppose ideally we should only apply the mapping where the param type is
actually BOOL and not just whenever the argument on the Java side is a boolean.

AndyT (lordpixel - the cat who walks through walls) A little bigger on the inside

(see you later space cowboy, you can't take the sky from me)