57 messages in net.java.dev.glassfish.adminRe: Final Review of create-domain man...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dixie Pine | Oct 6, 2009 4:58 pm |  .pdf, .pdf, .pdf |
| Kedar Mhaswade | Oct 14, 2009 5:14 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 14, 2009 8:30 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 16, 2009 5:37 pm | .pdf, .pdf, .pdf |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 19, 2009 6:16 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 20, 2009 10:27 am | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 20, 2009 10:42 am | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 20, 2009 2:06 pm | .pdf |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 20, 2009 2:18 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 20, 2009 2:26 pm | |
| kedar | Oct 20, 2009 2:52 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 21, 2009 3:52 pm | .pdf |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 21, 2009 3:54 pm | .pdf |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 21, 2009 6:38 pm | |
| Paul Davies | Oct 21, 2009 6:58 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 21, 2009 7:33 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 21, 2009 9:13 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 12:00 pm | .pdf |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 12:01 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 12:38 pm | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 22, 2009 12:48 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 22, 2009 12:53 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 2:31 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 22, 2009 2:50 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 22, 2009 2:51 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 22, 2009 3:57 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 22, 2009 8:53 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 22, 2009 9:00 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 22, 2009 9:48 pm | |
| Lloyd Chambers | Oct 23, 2009 10:07 am | |
| Lloyd Chambers | Oct 23, 2009 10:11 am | |
| Paul Davies | Oct 23, 2009 1:14 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 23, 2009 1:18 pm | |
| Lloyd Chambers | Oct 23, 2009 3:13 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 28, 2009 5:49 pm | .pdf |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 28, 2009 5:53 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 29, 2009 10:07 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 30, 2009 8:37 am | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 30, 2009 8:46 am | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 30, 2009 9:39 am | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 30, 2009 11:28 am | |
| Lloyd Chambers | Oct 30, 2009 11:42 am | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 30, 2009 1:07 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 30, 2009 1:32 pm | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 30, 2009 2:01 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 30, 2009 2:21 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Oct 30, 2009 2:35 pm | |
| Nandini Ektare | Oct 30, 2009 2:54 pm | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Oct 30, 2009 3:01 pm | |
| Dixie Pine | Oct 30, 2009 4:15 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Nov 2, 2009 5:01 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Nov 2, 2009 5:03 pm | |
| Sankar Neelakandan | Nov 2, 2009 5:30 pm | |
| June...@Sun.COM | Nov 3, 2009 10:15 am | |
| Paul Davies | Nov 3, 2009 12:33 pm | |
| Bill Shannon | Nov 3, 2009 12:51 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Final Review of create-domain man page | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Sankar Neelakandan (Sank...@Sun.COM) | |
| Date: | Oct 21, 2009 6:38:29 pm | |
| List: | net.java.dev.glassfish.admin | |
Okay more details are missing.
option --portbase is mutually exclusive with other options --adminport --instanceport & --domainproperties, meaning when --portbase is specified all the other options will not be accepted. I don't know how you can state that in the synopsis.
If --portbase is omitted --adminport defaults to 4848 --instanceport defaults to 8080 , so it will show up in the command usage as default values.
thanks Sankar
Dixie Pine wrote:
On 10/20/09 02:18 PM, Sankar Neelakandan wrote:
Hi Dixie, --adminport and --portbase are mutually exclusive options. It should be described as [--adminport 4848 | --portbase portbase] [--instanceport 8080]
I looked at the command message and I see no attempt to indicate mutual exclusivity. It gets very complicated, especially when instanceport is factored in. So I added a sentence in each port option description to explain the mutual exclusivity.
*BUG?* 4848 and 8080 should not be in the command message, but they are. They should be shown as <adminport> and <instanceport> replaceables. I changed the man page. Can the command message be fixed?
Dixie
-Sankar
Dixie Pine wrote:
I removed --user from Synopsis and list of options, added new paragraph in description, added description for --nopassword. Please review.
dixie
On 10/20/09 10:42 AM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Dixie Pine wrote on 10/20/09 10:27:
On 10/19/09 18:16, Bill Shannon wrote:
--user really is just an asadmin option, except with create-domain we make it a *required* option. There was no other good way to specify that requirement in the command usage so I added it as a subcommand option that is required.
okay. What description do you want for the option? The asadmin option version says this:
--user The user name of the authorized administsrative user of the DAS.
Well, since adding the --nopassword option, it's no longer true that --user is required, so I'll update the command usage to remove --user. It will just be an asadmin utility option, but the man page will need to describe how it's used.
This is another one of those "you have to specify option A or option B" cases. If you specify --nopassword, --user is optional.
--user specifies the user name of the administrative user that will be created for the new domain. If not specified, and --nopassword is specified, the default user name "admin" is used.
Try this:
The create-domain command creates a domain with a single administrative user specified by the --user asadmin utility option. If the --nopassword option is specified and the --user option is not specified, the default admin user "admin" is used. If the --nopassword is not specified, a user name is required and will be prompted for (if interactive) if not specified using the --user option.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------