22 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-develRe: [Xen-devel] Re: Improving hvm IO ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Tristan Gingold21 Feb 2007 21:22 
Keir Fraser21 Feb 2007 23:59 
tgin...@free.fr22 Feb 2007 01:33 
Keir Fraser22 Feb 2007 02:23 
Guy Zana22 Feb 2007 02:33 
Anthony Liguori22 Feb 2007 08:05 
tgin...@free.fr22 Feb 2007 12:58 
Anthony Liguori22 Feb 2007 13:22 
Mark Williamson22 Feb 2007 13:23 
Anthony Liguori22 Feb 2007 13:32 
Mark Williamson22 Feb 2007 13:40 
Anthony Liguori22 Feb 2007 16:12 
Mark Williamson22 Feb 2007 16:15 
Alan22 Feb 2007 16:26 
Alan22 Feb 2007 16:31 
Alan23 Feb 2007 04:57 
Anthony Liguori23 Feb 2007 10:55 
Tristan Gingold23 Feb 2007 22:06 
Tristan Gingold23 Feb 2007 22:12 
Tristan Gingold23 Feb 2007 22:17 
Tristan Gingold23 Feb 2007 22:19 
Mark Williamson27 Feb 2007 04:13 
Subject:Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Improving hvm IO performance by using self IO emulator (YA io-emu?)
From:Alan (al@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date:02/22/2007 04:31:51 PM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-devel

Can SATA drives queue multiple outstanding requests? Thought some newer rev could, but I may well be misremembering - in any case we'd want something that was well supported.

Most SATA drives support NCQ which is sensible queuing and all the rest of it. Some early ones get it badly wrong. You need a controller interface that handles it and a device that handles it. Devices pretending to be PATA controllers lack the brains but AHCI is a current intel standard used by many vendors for this role and intended to replace SFF style IDE.

Alam