14 messages in com.googlegroups.pylons-discussRe: Response| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Philip Jenvey | 21 Jun 2006 13:21 | |
| Jose Galvez | 21 Jun 2006 13:24 | |
| Jose Galvez | 21 Jun 2006 13:28 | |
| ToddG | 21 Jun 2006 14:31 | |
| jose | 22 Jun 2006 10:13 | |
| Ian Bicking | 22 Jun 2006 10:22 | |
| Ben Bangert | 22 Jun 2006 10:26 | |
| Ian Bicking | 22 Jun 2006 13:45 | |
| Ben Bangert | 22 Jun 2006 14:05 | |
| Ben Bangert | 22 Jun 2006 14:30 | |
| Jose Galvez | 22 Jun 2006 14:40 | |
| Ben Bangert | 22 Jun 2006 15:44 | |
| ToddG | 22 Jun 2006 17:16 | |
| ToddG | 22 Jun 2006 17:26 |
| Subject: | Re: Response![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Jose Galvez (jj.g...@gmail.com) |
| Date: | 06/21/2006 01:28:15 PM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.pylons-discuss |
Sorry I spoke to soon without looking at the changeset. Actually I like better what you did having response return WSCGIResponse which makes sense to me. So now we can use response or WSCGIResponse which is exactly what the response is. Thanks Jose
On 6/21/06, Philip Jenvey <pjen...@groovie.org> wrote:
On Jun 6, 2006, at 8:54 PM, Jose Galvez wrote:
I know, I just looked through the paste code and saw that. I just like consistency it didn't make to much sense to me that request was all in lowercase and Response was capitalized.
In practice, I also noticed the inconsistency does feel a little awkward. I've switched trunk to use a 'response' function, which does the same thing as Response.
http://pylonshq.com/project/pylonshq/changeset/1000
Thanks,
-- Philip Jenvey
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to pylo...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pylo...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---




