17 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] Re: how does maildrop...
FromSent OnAttachments
Ben RosengartJul 30, 2002 11:15 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 2:30 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 30, 2002 9:07 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 10:02 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 30, 2002 10:18 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 31, 2002 12:06 am 
Ben RosengartJul 31, 2002 8:11 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 31, 2002 2:38 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 31, 2002 10:35 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 31, 2002 10:54 pm 
zennAug 1, 2002 7:39 am 
Ben RosengartAug 1, 2002 8:44 am 
Michael LeoneAug 1, 2002 8:54 am 
Ben RosengartAug 1, 2002 10:06 am 
Sam VarshavchikAug 1, 2002 10:23 am 
zennAug 2, 2002 12:53 am 
Robert FlemingAug 2, 2002 9:33 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [maildropl] Re: how does maildrop decide what auth method to use?Actions...
From:Ben Rosengart (br+c@panix.com)
Date:Aug 1, 2002 10:06:52 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop

On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 11:51:50AM -0400, Michael Leone wrote:

I use Courier POP, Courier IMAP, and standalone Maildrop, using postfix as MTA, not Courier MTA. All came as separately available packages, from Debian unstable. I didn't have to compile anything.

Sounds like it might be a packaging issue.

Sam offers sqwebmail, maildrop, and courier-imap as standalone packages, but not courier-pop, as far as I can tell. Some Debian maintainer did the work of packaging courier-pop separately. That's nice for Debian users, but it doesn't help me.

Some of us like compiling everything ourselves, btw. Not only is it often necessary in a large and complex enough environment, it's also a nice way to get some familiarity with how the software is structured.

-- Ben Rosengart (212) 741-4400 x215

Microsoft has argued that open source is bad for business, but you have to ask, "Whose business? Theirs, or yours?" --Tim O'Reilly