| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| papo...@astart.com | Jul 5, 2000 7:31 pm | |
| Chuck Robey | Jul 7, 2000 7:32 pm | |
| Kelly Yancey | Jul 7, 2000 10:47 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Jul 7, 2000 11:25 pm | |
| papo...@astart.com | Jul 8, 2000 1:11 pm | |
| papo...@astart.com | Jul 8, 2000 2:00 pm | |
| Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami | Jul 9, 2000 12:14 am | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Jul 9, 2000 4:55 am | |
| Chuck Robey | Jul 9, 2000 11:46 am | |
| papo...@astart.com | Jul 9, 2000 12:39 pm | |
| papo...@astart.com | Jul 9, 2000 2:01 pm | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Jul 9, 2000 2:34 pm | |
| Darren Henderson | Jul 9, 2000 3:08 pm | |
| Doug Barton | Jul 9, 2000 4:48 pm | |
| papo...@astart.com | Jul 9, 2000 5:22 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Jul 10, 2000 3:51 am | |
| David O'Brien | Jul 10, 2000 3:53 am | |
| Poul-Henning Kamp | Jul 10, 2000 4:01 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jul 10, 2000 4:21 am | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Jul 10, 2000 6:11 am | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Jul 10, 2000 7:57 am | |
| Dan Nelson | Jul 10, 2000 8:00 am | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Jul 10, 2000 8:24 am | |
| Nate Williams | Jul 10, 2000 8:46 am | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Jul 10, 2000 9:18 am | |
| David O'Brien | Jul 10, 2000 10:49 am | |
| Mark Murray | Jul 10, 2000 12:15 pm | |
| Chuck Robey | Jul 10, 2000 6:02 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Jul 10, 2000 11:58 pm | |
| Chuck Robey | Jul 11, 2000 5:07 am | |
| Darren Henderson | Jul 11, 2000 6:45 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jul 11, 2000 6:51 am | |
| Neil Blakey-Milner | Jul 11, 2000 7:03 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jul 11, 2000 7:09 am | |
| David O'Brien | Jul 11, 2000 9:20 am | |
| David O'Brien | Jul 11, 2000 9:22 am | |
| David O'Brien | Jul 11, 2000 9:51 am | |
| Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group | Jul 11, 2000 10:21 am | |
| Narvi | Jul 11, 2000 10:43 am | |
| David O'Brien | Jul 11, 2000 11:04 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jul 11, 2000 12:14 pm | |
| Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group | Jul 11, 2000 1:03 pm | |
| Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group | Jul 11, 2000 1:17 pm | |
| Narvi | Jul 11, 2000 1:44 pm | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Jul 11, 2000 1:53 pm | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Jul 11, 2000 1:58 pm | |
| Nimrod Mesika | Jul 11, 2000 2:25 pm | |
| Mike Pritchard | Jul 11, 2000 3:00 pm | |
| Chuck Robey | Jul 11, 2000 3:22 pm | |
| Wes Peters | Jul 11, 2000 4:10 pm | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Jul 11, 2000 4:27 pm | |
| Jeroen C. van Gelderen | Jul 11, 2000 6:38 pm | |
| Chuck Robey | Jul 11, 2000 8:18 pm | |
| Jeroen C. van Gelderen | Jul 11, 2000 9:25 pm | |
| Jack Rusher | Jul 11, 2000 9:44 pm | |
| Jordan K. Hubbard | Jul 11, 2000 10:27 pm | |
| Daniel C. Sobral | Jul 12, 2000 5:35 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jul 12, 2000 5:59 am | |
| Jack Rusher | Jul 12, 2000 9:58 am | |
| Jordan K. Hubbard | Jul 12, 2000 12:51 pm | |
| Brian Dean | Jul 12, 2000 1:13 pm | |
| Jack Rusher | Jul 12, 2000 1:18 pm | |
| Mike Smith | Jul 12, 2000 1:55 pm | |
| papo...@astart.com | Jul 13, 2000 8:47 am | |
| Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group | Jul 13, 2000 11:22 am | |
| papo...@astart.com | Jul 14, 2000 2:53 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? - License Issues | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Garance A Drosihn (dro...@rpi.edu) | |
| Date: | Jul 10, 2000 9:18:52 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-arch | |
At 12:24 AM +0900 7/11/00, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
The package in the ports is licensed under Artistic/GPL. The BSD + keep copyright available on-demand is a much less restrictive license.
So, the assumption is that FreeBSD will only be allowed to use the BSD license if it removes the current version of lpr and changes lprNG from a port to an integral part of the distributed system?
No, that's not the assumption. I'm just countering your argument that the version imported would be _less_ "free" or "flexible" or something than the version in the ports.
Just as an aside, I think we're a bit out-of-sync here. I have not made any assertions about lprNG being free or flexible (or not-free or not-flexible). About all I've said recently in this discussion was that I wanted someone to clarify the licensing issues that BSD/OS had for lprNG, and what that implies for licensing under freebsd.
In the message you replied to, I was again just asking for a better understanding of the licensing. Your comment (the part I quoted), states that the 'package in ports' is (and thus always will be) under Artistic/GPL license. I was just underlining that statement, to see if the implication of "always will be" is true. Ie, is it true that FreeBSD will NOT get a BSD+keep-copyright license for lprNG if we leave lprNG as a port?
That is just a question. It is not an argument.
--- Garance Alistair Drosehn = ga...@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or dro...@rpi.edu Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message





