216 messages in org.apache.wicket.usersRE: Free wicket from component hierar...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| 46 earlier messages | ||
| James Carman | Nov 6, 2010 5:12 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 6, 2010 5:20 am | |
| Jeremy Thomerson | Nov 6, 2010 6:22 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 6, 2010 6:43 am | |
| samket | Nov 6, 2010 6:54 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 6, 2010 4:44 pm | |
| Sebastian | Nov 8, 2010 8:17 am | |
| Vitaly Tsaplin | Nov 8, 2010 8:23 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 8, 2010 8:27 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 8, 2010 8:29 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 8, 2010 8:35 am | |
| Vitaly Tsaplin | Nov 8, 2010 8:35 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 8, 2010 8:42 am | |
| Sebastian | Nov 8, 2010 8:51 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 8, 2010 8:58 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 8, 2010 8:58 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 8, 2010 9:03 am | |
| Sebastian | Nov 8, 2010 9:07 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 8, 2010 9:13 am | |
| Omid Milani | Nov 8, 2010 9:31 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 8, 2010 9:32 am | |
| Rodolfo Hansen | Nov 8, 2010 10:01 am | |
| Eelco Hillenius | Nov 8, 2010 10:22 pm | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 8, 2010 10:39 pm | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 8, 2010 10:40 pm | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 12:15 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 12:19 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 12:23 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 12:41 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 12:44 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 1:01 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 4:12 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 4:21 am | |
| Vitaly Tsaplin | Nov 9, 2010 4:29 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 4:34 am | |
| Matthias Keller | Nov 9, 2010 4:46 am | |
| manuelbarzi | Nov 9, 2010 4:49 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 4:49 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 4:54 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 4:57 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 4:58 am | |
| manuelbarzi | Nov 9, 2010 5:26 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 5:48 am | |
| Frank Silbermann | Nov 9, 2010 6:46 am | |
| Martin Grigorov | Nov 9, 2010 6:58 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 7:02 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 7:05 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 7:11 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 7:14 am | |
| Frank Silbermann | Nov 9, 2010 7:19 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 7:20 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 7:22 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 7:26 am | |
| Frank Silbermann | Nov 9, 2010 7:28 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 7:32 am | |
| Wilhelmsen Tor Iver | Nov 9, 2010 7:32 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 7:33 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 7:36 am | |
| John Owen | Nov 9, 2010 7:36 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 7:38 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 7:45 am | |
| Frank Silbermann | Nov 9, 2010 7:48 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 7:51 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 7:57 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:00 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 8:04 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 8:05 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 8:06 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 8:07 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 8:10 am | |
| Sebastian | Nov 9, 2010 8:18 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:26 am | |
| manuelbarzi | Nov 9, 2010 8:31 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:33 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 8:34 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:36 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 8:37 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 8:39 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 8:40 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:46 am | |
| Carl-Eric Menzel | Nov 9, 2010 8:46 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 9, 2010 8:47 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 8:48 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:49 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 9, 2010 8:49 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:50 am | |
| Frank Silbermann | Nov 9, 2010 8:50 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 9, 2010 8:53 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 8:55 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 9, 2010 8:55 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:56 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:57 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 8:58 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 9, 2010 8:58 am | |
| Igor Vaynberg | Nov 9, 2010 8:59 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 8:59 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 9:03 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 9:05 am | |
| James Carman | Nov 9, 2010 9:11 am | |
| Martin Makundi | Nov 9, 2010 9:13 am | |
| 70 later messages | ||
| Subject: | RE: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Frank Silbermann (fran...@fedex.com) | |
| Date: | Nov 9, 2010 7:19:19 am | |
| List: | org.apache.wicket.users | |
As an alternative, suppose that one's non-panel compound component contained a map from wicket-id's to components. The hierarchy could be encoded in a lisp-like string; the component's constructor could parse the string and create the component hierarchy to match. The hierarchy string could be a configuration property that the constructor looks up.
When you want to use the component on an HTML page whose wicket-ids are embedded differently, set the configuration parameter to the desired hierarchy string.
So instead of asking, "How can we make Wicket different so that my problem will go away?" the proper question to try first is, "What is the Wicket way of solving my problem?"
-----Original Message----- From: Carl-Eric Menzel [mailto:cmen...@wicketbuch.de] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 9:12 AM To: use...@wicket.apache.org Subject: Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:21:46 +0200 Martin Makundi <mart...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
Here we finally come to an actual argument about this:
Panel is not reusable enough because it has its own markup. If I override its markup, it stops working.
Frank wrote in another message how to deal with this case. I agree with him and add: If your new panel is so different from the old panel that it requires a different internal hierarchy, it's no longer the same component. Use standard OO techniques to deal with it. Also, think about whether your component design (as in what parts form a component, and what parts don't) is correct. Seems to me that in such a case too many things have been thrown together that should not be together.
Carl-Eric www.wicketbuch.de