20 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: (fast)cgi and nginx - there has t...
FromSent OnAttachments
Jonathan VanascoSep 23, 2008 3:33 pm 
mikeSep 23, 2008 3:38 pm 
Rob SchultzSep 23, 2008 4:10 pm 
Roger HooverSep 23, 2008 4:13 pm 
mikeSep 23, 2008 4:48 pm 
Jim OhlsteinSep 23, 2008 4:57 pm 
Aleksandar LazicSep 23, 2008 11:54 pm 
Jonathan VanascoSep 25, 2008 7:07 am 
Reinis RozitisSep 25, 2008 8:13 am 
Almir KaricSep 25, 2008 9:35 am 
mikeSep 25, 2008 11:08 am 
Reinis RozitisSep 25, 2008 11:40 am 
mikeSep 25, 2008 11:49 am 
Aleksandar LazicSep 25, 2008 11:24 pm 
Reinis RozitisSep 26, 2008 2:57 am 
Igor SysoevSep 26, 2008 3:02 am 
Reinis RozitisSep 26, 2008 3:29 am 
Almir KaricSep 26, 2008 7:11 am 
Tit PetricSep 27, 2008 1:04 am 
Phillip B OldhamSep 29, 2008 5:15 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: (fast)cgi and nginx - there has to be a better wayActions...
From:Reinis Rozitis (r@roze.lv)
Date:Sep 26, 2008 3:29:09 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

Never. I do want to allow unscaleable and unmaintainable configurations.

Igor can you a bit explain in what way that turns out unscalable or unmaintable (are the any internal restrictions to that)?

I mean in most webservers you can specify the 'handlers' globaly like for '*.php' '.cgi' etc etc.. And In most cases (imho) the only thing which changes within a virtualhost is the document root. In nginx you have to redefine everything - which might be nice as it gives the isolation between seperate vhosts then again is it used so often?

Of course we can't object to your decisions (otherways nginx wouldn't be here as it is) but maybe you can give some reasons behind?

rr