atom feed13 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.docbook-appsRe: DOCBOOK-APPS: Chunk wish
FromSent OnAttachments
benApr 9, 2001 1:36 pm 
Mark PilgrimApr 11, 2001 2:01 pm 
benApr 13, 2001 12:03 pm 
Norman WalshApr 15, 2001 4:58 am 
benApr 15, 2001 7:42 am 
Dave PawsonApr 15, 2001 7:49 am 
Norman WalshApr 16, 2001 12:56 pm 
Dave PawsonApr 18, 2001 10:22 pm 
Sylvain AmraniApr 22, 2001 3:14 pm 
Richard SharpeApr 22, 2001 8:51 pm 
Norman WalshApr 23, 2001 3:44 am.dvi
Norman WalshApr 24, 2001 5:58 am 
benApr 27, 2001 6:48 pm 
Subject:Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Chunk wish
From:ben (nico@libertysurf.fr)
Date:Apr 15, 2001 7:42:01 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.docbook-apps

Norman Walsh a écrit :

/ ben <nico@libertysurf.fr> was heard to say: | I think it could be interesting to specify at which level you want the | document splitted. In the current implementation it splits for each | section, and I would like to have some new variable (such as | chunk.level) through wich you could say to split for each chapter, each | part, etc.

Chunking is not a simple task. The stylesheet has to calculate all sorts of navigation information (previous, next, up, and home links), and calculate the right filename for every cross-reference target. And as of a few minutes ago, correctly handle footnote processing :-)

Yes, I've seen it :-)

I'd love to allow more easily customized chunking, but I haven't figured out how just yet. In order to change it, you have to override a small number of templates. Look in chunk-common for an example.

Yes, I've overriden two templates to chunk by chapters. In fact, something interesting could be to put the splitting choice in a single template (such as "chunk") and make the chunking template engine ("process-chunk-element") use the chunk template result. But I'm sure it is not easy to do!

Perhaps it would make sense to provide several "chunking" variants. In addition to what is supported now, what other variations would people like to see?

Mine is: chapter chunking.

BG