28 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.egovRe: [egov] UN XML project gains Micro...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | May 17, 2003 7:22 am | |
| Paul Spencer | May 19, 2003 1:41 am | |
| Farrukh Najmi | May 19, 2003 8:34 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | May 19, 2003 8:46 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | May 19, 2003 9:14 am | |
| Chiusano Joseph | May 19, 2003 9:32 am | |
| Paul Spencer | May 19, 2003 10:43 am | |
| Duane Nickull | May 19, 2003 12:50 pm | |
| Chiusano Joseph | May 19, 2003 3:48 pm | |
| Duane Nickull | May 20, 2003 9:16 am | |
| Chiusano Joseph | May 20, 2003 10:17 am | |
| Farrukh Najmi | May 20, 2003 10:46 am | |
| Chiusano Joseph | May 20, 2003 10:51 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | May 20, 2003 12:04 pm | |
| Duane Nickull | May 20, 2003 12:11 pm | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | May 20, 2003 8:07 pm | |
| Monica J. Martin | May 20, 2003 8:43 pm | |
| Duane Nickull | May 20, 2003 9:33 pm | |
| Duane Nickull | May 20, 2003 9:37 pm | |
| Farrukh Najmi | May 21, 2003 3:14 am | |
| Monica J. Martin | May 21, 2003 6:14 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | May 21, 2003 6:15 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | May 21, 2003 6:26 am | |
| Duane Nickull | May 21, 2003 10:46 am | |
| Zachary Alexander | May 21, 2003 12:55 pm | |
| Duane Nickull | May 21, 2003 1:24 pm | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | May 21, 2003 8:52 pm | |
| Monica J. Martin | May 22, 2003 9:06 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [egov] UN XML project gains Microsoft support | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Duane Nickull (dua...@yellowdragonsoft.com) | |
| Date: | May 19, 2003 12:50:29 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.egov | |
Farrukh Najmi wrote:
While it will take some time for the dust to settle, a desirable outcome could well be that CCTS uses ebRIM to define its serialization format, UBL uses Core Components BIEs and therefor indirectly uses ebRIM format as the picture below shows:
+1
I would personally be against a re-write of ebRIM that results in a direct dependancy on CCTS within the Registry specification or vica versa. That would not be, IMHO, good architecture or engineering. RIM is extensible enough to handle the needs of CCTS right now.
The Registry should be agnostic to how users use its' content. It's scope should be as a registry and repository, nothing more. The Registry team have done an excellent job of creating it as such. Let's not change that.
Duane Nickull
-- *************************************************** Yellow Dragon Software - http://www.yellowdragonsoft.com Professional Software Development & Metadata Management Project Team Lead - UN/CEFACT eBusiness Architecture Direct: +1 (604) 726-3329 - Canada: Pacific Standard Time