I am a bit concerned about the wording of Section 2.2.
It would be nice to have some discussion on how optional we want the
basic MUWS manageability capabilities to be.
The new words Igor put into the 2 March version are good examples, but
end up leaving the door open to it being completely optional whether to
use MUWS or not.
If we want to allow a particular domain to replace something in MUWS
with something specific to their domain (say, a domain doesn't like the
MUWS Resource States and replaces with their own Resource States), we
need to be prescriptive on how to do so.
John DeCarlo, The MITRE Corporation, My Views Are My Own
DISA cube: 703-882-0593