atom feed20 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: AJP Support
FromSent OnAttachments
Stephen Nelson-SmithJun 23, 2008 2:33 am 
Manlio PerilloJun 23, 2008 3:32 am 
Igor SysoevJun 23, 2008 12:42 pm 
Stephen Nelson-SmithJun 23, 2008 11:54 pm 
Igor SysoevJun 23, 2008 11:59 pm 
Stephen Nelson-SmithJun 24, 2008 12:11 am 
Igor SysoevJun 24, 2008 12:22 am 
mikeJun 24, 2008 12:26 am 
Stephen Nelson-SmithJun 24, 2008 3:45 am 
Henrik VendelboJun 24, 2008 4:02 am 
Igor SysoevJun 24, 2008 4:03 am 
Stephen Nelson-SmithJun 24, 2008 4:16 am 
Igor SysoevJun 24, 2008 5:23 am 
Phillip B OldhamJun 24, 2008 5:46 am 
Paul DekkersJun 24, 2008 5:51 am 
Stephen Nelson-SmithJun 24, 2008 9:56 am 
Stephen Nelson-SmithJun 24, 2008 11:31 pm 
Dan MJun 25, 2008 12:52 pm 
Cliff WellsJun 26, 2008 11:40 am 
Igor SysoevJun 26, 2008 12:20 pm 
Subject:Re: AJP Support
From:Paul Dekkers (Paul@public.gmane.org)
Date:Jun 24, 2008 5:51:17 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:

Igor Sysoev wrote:

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:33:41AM +0100, Stephen Nelson-Smith wrote:

I currently use apache 2.2 with mod_proxy_ajp to load-balance a Java application running on 3 tomcat servers.

I've had good results with nginx for a php and RoR site, and would be interested in replacing apache with nginx in this configuration.

Does nginx support ajp13 connections? Has anyone on the list done anything similar?

No, nginx does not support AJP, and it's difficult to add...

OK. I guess I could just have nginx balance the http traffic and have use tomcat's http server rather than passing through ajp13 traffic.

Just a curiosity: do you think this (nginx to tomcat via http) would be faster than using apache 2.2 with mod_proxy_ajp? I'm not sure, but there's probably a reason for using AJP instead of http there ;-) If nginx with http would be better/faster, that would be very interesting indeed.

Paul