18 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Cisco 7304 as a Border router
FromSent OnAttachments
Robert BlayzorJan 14, 2005 10:30 am 
McCallum, RobertJan 14, 2005 10:39 am 
Clinton WorkJan 14, 2005 1:03 pm 
Rodney DunnJan 14, 2005 1:44 pm 
Mark PriorJan 15, 2005 12:24 am 
Majid FaridJan 15, 2005 4:59 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 5:27 am 
sth...@nethelp.noJan 15, 2005 9:03 am 
Robert BlayzorJan 15, 2005 10:15 am 
Mark PriorJan 15, 2005 11:25 pm 
sth...@nethelp.noJan 16, 2005 12:17 am 
Majid FaridJan 16, 2005 2:23 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 16, 2005 2:31 am 
McCallum, RobertJan 16, 2005 5:01 pm 
Majid FaridJan 17, 2005 12:12 pm 
Kevin GrahamJan 17, 2005 9:36 pm 
McCallum, RobertJan 18, 2005 4:59 am 
Simon LeinenJan 21, 2005 3:20 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] Cisco 7304 as a Border routerActions...
From:Robert Blayzor (rbla@inoc.net)
Date:Jan 15, 2005 10:15:11 am
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

Mark Prior wrote:

We have a 7304-G100 acting as a border router, multiple OC12 transits, but it doesn't really like a large number of flows in that role so DOS is esepcially annoying. It's fine as an edge system though. The native ATM card has MTU problems so I would avoid it. We also had issues with the system turning off both ports on the dual OC12 card when it had a problem with one of the ports which we considered pretty anti-social. We've also had a couple of unexplainable reloads.

Great, thanks. This is exactly the information I'm looking for. I've pretty much taken the 7300 of the solution list due to all the feedbacks I've gotten now. (many of which state some of the very things you mentioned).

I'm actually looking at the 7606 now with the Sup 720-3BXL. Unfortunately the GSR's seem like a little bit overkill and out of budget right now.

Me no internet, only janitor, me just wax floors.