| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dave Johnson | Apr 11, 2006 10:01 am | |
| Bill Tribley | Apr 11, 2006 5:42 pm | |
| David M Johnson | Apr 19, 2006 7:00 am | |
| Matt Raible | Apr 19, 2006 7:34 am | |
| David M Johnson | Apr 19, 2006 7:57 am | |
| Anil Gangolli | Apr 19, 2006 8:09 am | |
| Allen Gilliland | Apr 19, 2006 9:11 am | |
| Elias Torres | Apr 19, 2006 9:15 am | |
| Henri Yandell | Apr 21, 2006 11:56 am | |
| David M Johnson | Apr 24, 2006 10:49 am | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Apr 24, 2006 4:14 pm | |
| David M Johnson | Apr 24, 2006 6:05 pm | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Apr 24, 2006 7:06 pm | |
| David M Johnson | Apr 25, 2006 8:19 am | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Apr 25, 2006 7:13 pm | |
| David M Johnson | Apr 27, 2006 7:00 am | |
| Cliff Schmidt | Apr 27, 2006 3:14 pm | |
| David M Johnson | Apr 27, 2006 3:34 pm | |
| Dave Johnson | Apr 27, 2006 9:39 pm | |
| Jim Jagielski | Apr 28, 2006 6:17 am | |
| David M Johnson | Apr 28, 2006 6:26 am | |
| Cliff Schmidt | Apr 28, 2006 8:19 am | |
| Dave Johnson | Apr 28, 2006 9:06 am | |
| Noel J. Bergman | Apr 28, 2006 6:17 pm | |
| David M Johnson | Apr 28, 2006 7:07 pm | |
| Craig McClanahan | Apr 28, 2006 7:11 pm | |
| Henri Yandell | Apr 29, 2006 12:14 am | |
| Anil Gangolli | Apr 29, 2006 7:55 am | |
| David Crossley | Apr 30, 2006 4:46 pm | |
| Cliff Schmidt | Apr 30, 2006 5:22 pm | |
| David M Johnson | May 1, 2006 8:43 am | |
| Tribley William-cwt010 | May 1, 2006 9:00 am | |
| Allen Gilliland | May 1, 2006 9:16 am | |
| Tribley William-cwt010 | May 1, 2006 9:24 am | |
| Allen Gilliland | May 1, 2006 9:26 am | |
| David M Johnson | May 1, 2006 9:44 am | |
| Jeff Blattman | May 1, 2006 9:47 am | |
| Allen Gilliland | May 1, 2006 9:48 am | |
| David M Johnson | May 1, 2006 4:20 pm | |
| Anil Gangolli | May 2, 2006 7:53 am | |
| Matt Raible | May 2, 2006 9:53 am | |
| Henri Yandell | May 13, 2006 12:32 pm | |
| Dave Johnson | May 14, 2006 5:34 pm | |
| Dave Lindsey | May 15, 2006 6:08 am |
| Subject: | Scrapping 2.2 -- was Re: VOTE: Release Roller 2.2-incubating | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | David M Johnson (Davi...@Sun.COM) | |
| Date: | May 1, 2006 8:43:22 am | |
| List: | org.apache.roller.dev | |
Cliff Schmidt, our legal affairs guy, is insisting that we add Apache copyright headers to all files in the Roller 2.2 release before we can make the release. That's fine, but 2.2 is old news now and I'd like to move forward.
So... since some of us have already put the Roller 2.3 code base through testing and into production, I would like to focus instead on getting a Roller 2.3 release out the door with full Apache copyright, licensing and packaging compliance.
Here's what I'd like to do in the Roller trunk: 1 - Add copyright headers to all files 2 - Implement Proposal_RemoveUnshippables (http://tinyurl.com/rl8qo) 3 - Refactor for org.apache.roller packaging 4 - Put together a Roller 2.3 release candidate (with all 2.2 and 2.3 features)
I'd like to get this over as quickly as possible (i.e. today/ tomorrow) so we can proceed with Roller 3.0 developments like better URLs and the front-page improvements. And BTW, Anil has already started #1 and I've already implemented much of #2.
Does anybody object to my moving ahead with this work in the trunk? I'd welcome comments, critiques and suggestions about any part of the plan.
- Dave
On Apr 30, 2006, at 8:22 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
On 4/30/06, David Crossley <cros...@apache.org> wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
David M Johnson <Davi...@sun.com> wrote:
OK, so Cliff says we need to have copyright notices on all files before we can release 2.2 and that we should make the release on Apache infrastructure this time.
He also mentioned that somebody has a script that will automatically apply said copyright notice to all source files. Anybody know where this script can be found?
There are a variety of relicensing scripts in various languages, in the "relicense" subdirectory of the "committers" SVN module. You should have access to that by checking out [1].
- Dave
Craig
I have some local modifications to the Perl version of that tool, but i am waiting to hear the outcome of last week's board meeting before committing the changes.
I explained the issues to the board last week and told them that we now have a header approved by our lawyers -- just waiting on one last piece of feedback before sending out the proposed text and process to the legal-discuss list. I told the board I'd have the official resolution ready for them to vote on at the May 17th meeting.
Cliff





