77 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Re: freemail list and...
FromSent OnAttachments
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 5, 2004 11:31 am 
Jeff PotterJan 5, 2004 12:58 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 5, 2004 1:26 pm 
Gerardo GregoryJan 5, 2004 1:34 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 5, 2004 1:56 pm 
Andrew NewtonJan 5, 2004 3:02 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 5, 2004 3:23 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 5, 2004 3:38 pm 
Andrew NewtonJan 5, 2004 5:49 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 5, 2004 5:57 pm 
Andrew NewtonJan 5, 2004 7:06 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 5, 2004 8:19 pm 
Gordon MessmerJan 5, 2004 11:58 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 4:10 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 4:11 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 4:12 am 
Gordon MessmerJan 6, 2004 10:20 am 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 6, 2004 10:50 am 
Malcolm WeirJan 6, 2004 2:10 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 3:07 pm 
Phillip HutchingsJan 6, 2004 3:28 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 3:44 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 3:46 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 6, 2004 3:56 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 4:17 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 4:31 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 4:45 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 5:17 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 5:20 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 5:33 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 5:51 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 6:12 pm 
Malcolm WeirJan 6, 2004 6:17 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 6:22 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 6:34 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 6:47 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 7:10 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 7:42 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 7:53 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 7:54 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 7:56 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 8:13 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 8:16 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 8:19 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 8:22 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 8:22 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 8:29 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 6, 2004 11:19 pm 
RolandJan 7, 2004 3:56 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 7, 2004 4:14 am 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 10:47 am 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 10:59 am 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 7, 2004 11:37 am 
Malcolm WeirJan 7, 2004 12:18 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 1:09 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 1:40 pm 
Gordon MessmerJan 7, 2004 3:08 pm 
Malcolm WeirJan 7, 2004 3:14 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 7, 2004 3:32 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 7, 2004 3:46 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 7, 2004 3:50 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 3:52 pm 
Bill MichellJan 7, 2004 3:54 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 7, 2004 3:56 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 4:03 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 4:06 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 7, 2004 4:12 pm 
Phillip HutchingsJan 7, 2004 4:16 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 7, 2004 4:27 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 4:29 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 7, 2004 4:32 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 4:33 pm 
Gordon MessmerJan 7, 2004 4:58 pm 
Malcolm WeirJan 7, 2004 5:07 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 5:27 pm 
Phillip HutchingsJan 7, 2004 6:33 pm 
Gordon MessmerJan 7, 2004 7:00 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[courier-users] Re: freemail list and questions about yahoo...Actions...
From:Sam Varshavchik (mrs@courier-mta.com)
Date:Jan 7, 2004 4:14:43 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Roger B.A. Klorese writes:

Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Yes, they can. SMTP's twin sister, the mail submission protocol, uses port 587, which will be unaffected by Earthlink's stupid firewall.

Perhaps. But why assume it won't be blocked?

Why assume that it will be?

I'd expect them to block it in a New York minute.

Why do you expect that? If they were going to do that, they would've done that already. Port 587 is not a new invention. It's been here for a while.

The justification for blocking port 25 is to prevent their customers from hijacking open relays, and having to deal with the resulting complaints. By definition, port 587 requires authentication, and cannot be hijacked.