Title: Re: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM

I will share the results with his permission.

Duane

On 9/21/06 10:56 AM, "Laskey, Ken" <klas...@mitre.org> wrote:

This list not only includes the kitchen sink but every dirty dish that was runored to be in it. A quick look shows he still has WSDL 1.2 as current and there may be other aberrations, but keeping such a list up to date would be a full time job. Talking about all of this in a reference model would have SOA-RM being an encyclopedia. But I'll be interested if and how he responds to Duane's email. Ken

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Jeffrey A. Estefan [mailto:jeff...@jpl.nasa.gov] Sent: Thu 9/21/2006 1:51 PM To: soa...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM Duane, Does it really matter if we get a couple of NO votes? I'm not familiar with the OASIS requirements on whether formal spec adoption as an official OASIS Standard requires a unanimous YES vote or not. Incidentally, the Momentum folks are the ones who stood up the following site: http://www.serviceoriented.org/service_oriented_enterprise.html If you look at the list of SOA-related terms/contents at this link: http://www.serviceoriented.org/table_of_contents.html you can see where Jeff S. may be coming from in terms of completeness. I came across this material a couple of years ago. Also note that Jeff S. is the CEO of Momentum. Cheers... - Jeff

-- ****************************************************** Sr. Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc. * Chair - OASIS SOA Reference Model Technical Committee* Blog: http://technoracle.blogspot.com * ******************************************************