For giggles I'd still try cbitplcp instead of ADM. Kind of odd to see a
cbitadm ATM circuit.
-Dave
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Voll, Scott wrote:
Yes. They just had me add
atm scrambling cell-payload
no atm ilmi-keepalive
but still no love.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Pinsky [mailto:bep at whack.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 1:08 PM
To: Voll, Scott
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Trying to get an ATM ciruit up
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Voll, Scott wrote:
| I'm on the phone and they are telling me yes, c-bit ADM.
|
Also, could they be configured for scrambling?
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Bruce Pinsky [mailto:bep at whack.org]
| Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 1:02 PM
| To: Voll, Scott
| Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
| Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Trying to get an ATM ciruit up
|
| Voll, Scott wrote:
| | Router1#sh controllers atm
| | ATM4/0/0: Port adaptor specific information
| | Hardware is DS3 (45000Kbps) port adaptor
| | Framer is PMC PM7345 S/UNI-PDH, SAR is LSI ATMIZER II
| | Firmware rev: G152, ATMIZER II rev: 3
| | Framing mode: DS3 C-bit ADM
| | Default Maximum Queue Length: 0
| | Facility alarm: OOF LossOfCellDelineation
| | Facility statistics: current interval elapsed 524 seconds
| |
|
| You are getting an OOF (Out of Frame) alarm. Is this DS3 really
| provisioned C-bit ADM?
|
- --
=========
bep
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFB8B2uE1XcgMgrtyYRAuYEAJsEV3iCrNfXFJFtqvFMDH2q7ENV/QCfVH2f
PZIIw1ovq10KSGbfyy9Buxg=
=9Pkm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
13 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Trying to get an ATM ciruit up
