| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Stas Malyshev | May 8, 2011 4:40 pm | |
| Rasmus Lerdorf | May 8, 2011 8:30 pm | |
| Ferenc Kovacs | May 9, 2011 12:40 am | |
| Stas Malyshev | May 9, 2011 12:49 am | |
| Stefan Marr | May 9, 2011 1:00 am | |
| Ferenc Kovacs | May 9, 2011 1:01 am | |
| Ferenc Kovacs | May 9, 2011 1:03 am | |
| Stas Malyshev | May 9, 2011 1:37 am | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 7:44 am | |
| Martin Scotta | May 9, 2011 8:50 am | |
| Richard Quadling | May 9, 2011 9:13 am | |
| Philip Olson | May 9, 2011 9:17 am | |
| Rasmus Lerdorf | May 9, 2011 9:43 am | |
| Stas Malyshev | May 9, 2011 9:54 am | |
| Marcelo Gornstein | May 9, 2011 9:54 am | |
| Alessandro Nadalin | May 9, 2011 10:01 am | |
| Stas Malyshev | May 9, 2011 10:05 am | |
| Lester Caine | May 9, 2011 10:12 am | |
| Marcelo Gornstein | May 9, 2011 10:19 am | |
| Andi Gutmans | May 9, 2011 10:20 am | |
| Matthew Weier O'Phinney | May 9, 2011 10:21 am | |
| Derick Rethans | May 9, 2011 10:21 am | |
| Andi Gutmans | May 9, 2011 10:22 am | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 10:25 am | |
| Christopher Jones | May 9, 2011 10:27 am | |
| Stas Malyshev | May 9, 2011 10:30 am | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 10:31 am | |
| Andi Gutmans | May 9, 2011 10:32 am | |
| Rasmus Lerdorf | May 9, 2011 10:38 am | |
| Ferenc Kovacs | May 9, 2011 10:43 am | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 10:44 am | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 10:47 am | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 10:50 am | |
| Rasmus Lerdorf | May 9, 2011 10:53 am | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 11:07 am | |
| Stas Malyshev | May 9, 2011 11:13 am | |
| Stas Malyshev | May 9, 2011 11:35 am | |
| Ferenc Kovacs | May 9, 2011 11:39 am | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 11:52 am | |
| Stefan Marr | May 9, 2011 12:33 pm | |
| Lester Caine | May 9, 2011 2:41 pm | |
| dukeofgaming | May 9, 2011 3:00 pm | |
| Ilia Alshanetsky | May 9, 2011 3:09 pm | |
| Andi Gutmans | May 9, 2011 3:39 pm | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 4:26 pm | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 4:29 pm | |
| Lester Caine | May 9, 2011 5:25 pm | |
| Stas Malyshev | May 9, 2011 5:35 pm | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 5:35 pm | |
| Ferenc Kovacs | May 9, 2011 5:35 pm | |
| guil...@gmail.com | May 9, 2011 5:55 pm | |
| Stas Malyshev | May 9, 2011 6:22 pm | |
| Pierrick Charron | May 9, 2011 8:03 pm | |
| Mike Willbanks | May 9, 2011 8:42 pm | |
| Pierrick Charron | May 9, 2011 8:50 pm | |
| Drak | May 9, 2011 9:09 pm | |
| Lester Caine | May 9, 2011 10:45 pm | |
| 136 later messages | ||
| Subject: | Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Ferenc Kovacs (in...@tyrael.hu) | |
| Date: | May 9, 2011 1:03:54 am | |
| List: | net.php.lists.internals | |
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Stefan Marr <ph...@stefan-marr.de> wrote:
Hi:
On 09 May 2011, at 09:50, Stas Malyshev wrote:
I'm all for this idea, but the question is - can we have a good design &
implementation in next 2 months? If we can, great, if we can't - I'd rather have 5.4 than wait for it. E.g., if we have somebody ready to commit for certain timeframe to come up with it, then it makes sense to discuss it in this context.
Can't we just draw this arbitrary line in the sand, and say from now on, controversial things are taken out and nothing new is added anymore?
Everything which is not yet in trunk and is not required to round up the release should go into the release after 5.4?
For me it seems there is no progress because there is still to much opportunity to improve things... So, instead of allowing to nominate new features, it might be best to stick to what we have now, and restrict ourselves to sort out the controversial stuff.
I think that it would be nice to have a short timeframe before feature freeze.
Tyrael





