atom feed40 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: nvi maintainer?
FromSent OnAttachments
Will AndrewsJul 8, 2001 1:19 am 
Peter WemmJul 8, 2001 2:37 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupJul 8, 2001 7:25 am 
Dag-Erling SmorgravJul 8, 2001 7:34 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupJul 8, 2001 8:25 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupJul 8, 2001 8:25 am 
Justin T. GibbsJul 8, 2001 8:31 am 
Dag-Erling SmorgravJul 8, 2001 8:37 am 
Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems GroupJul 8, 2001 9:06 am 
Ben SmithurstJul 8, 2001 9:09 am 
scan...@jurai.netJul 8, 2001 9:09 am 
Matthew D. FullerJul 8, 2001 12:56 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 8:13 pm 
Steve KarglJul 8, 2001 9:24 pm 
Wes PetersJul 8, 2001 9:28 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 9:31 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 9:34 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 9:36 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 9:38 pm 
Mike SmithJul 8, 2001 9:42 pm 
Wes PetersJul 8, 2001 9:45 pm 
Joseph MallettJul 8, 2001 11:23 pm 
Joseph MallettJul 8, 2001 11:25 pm 
David O'BrienJul 8, 2001 11:39 pm 
Wes PetersJul 9, 2001 12:10 am 
Bernd WalterJul 9, 2001 6:07 am 
Bill FennerJul 9, 2001 11:16 am 
GHJul 9, 2001 2:46 pm 
TimJul 9, 2001 7:29 pm.maze4vi, .Other
Dag-Erling SmorgravJul 10, 2001 2:28 pm 
Bill FennerJul 10, 2001 2:38 pm 
Matt DillonJul 10, 2001 3:42 pm 
David O'BrienJul 10, 2001 3:48 pm 
Matt DillonJul 10, 2001 4:06 pm 
ar...@FreeBSD.ORGJul 10, 2001 4:10 pm 
Matt DillonJul 10, 2001 4:19 pm 
Keith BosticJul 10, 2001 6:18 pm 
Garance A DrosihnJul 10, 2001 6:18 pm 
Jason EvansJul 10, 2001 6:32 pm 
Brian F. FeldmanJul 11, 2001 10:17 am 
Subject:Re: nvi maintainer?
From:Garance A Drosihn (dro@rpi.edu)
Date:Jul 10, 2001 6:18:53 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

At 4:10 PM -0700 7/10/01, ar@FreeBSD.ORG wrote:

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 04:06:40PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:

I'm sorry Dave,

"David" please. :-)

but it's a matter of opinion. .. but that's doesn't mean my statement is backwards any more then yours is.

Exactly! :-) I was hoping people would get that idea and stop arging on the issue of split screen and undo. 40% of us feel nvi gets it wrong, another 40% feel vim gets it wrong, and the other 20% have never used multiple windows in any flavor of vi.

The point is that someone explicitly suggested that 'vim' should replace 'nvi'. (Will Andrews did, and other messages have implied that switch). No one is suggesting 'nvi' replace 'vim'. Given those facts, Matt's post makes sense and is on topic.

We were not arguing "split vs undo", we were discussing options for 'nvi'.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message