| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Josh Moore | May 7, 2011 3:31 pm | |
| Patrice Colet | May 8, 2011 1:52 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 8, 2011 7:46 am | |
| Martin Peach | May 8, 2011 8:48 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 8, 2011 4:51 pm | |
| Billy Stiltner | May 9, 2011 4:07 am | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 9, 2011 4:53 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 9, 2011 6:21 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 9, 2011 6:43 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 9, 2011 2:06 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 10, 2011 9:11 am | |
| Jaime Oliver | May 10, 2011 10:00 am | |
| Billy Stiltner | May 10, 2011 10:01 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 10, 2011 11:57 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 10, 2011 5:16 pm | |
| Patrice Colet | May 10, 2011 6:43 pm | |
| Simon Wise | May 11, 2011 1:19 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 11, 2011 1:23 am | |
| hard off | May 11, 2011 6:27 am | |
| Pedro Lopes | May 11, 2011 6:48 am | |
| hard off | May 11, 2011 6:55 am | |
| hard off | May 11, 2011 6:57 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 11, 2011 7:15 am | |
| Derek Holzer | May 11, 2011 9:58 am | |
| hard off | May 11, 2011 10:04 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 13, 2011 9:38 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 18, 2011 9:57 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | May 18, 2011 9:59 pm | |
| batinste | May 19, 2011 1:17 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 19, 2011 5:01 am | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 19, 2011 8:11 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 19, 2011 10:01 pm | |
| Simon Wise | May 20, 2011 7:04 am | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 21, 2011 3:21 pm | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 21, 2011 3:22 pm | |
| Simon Wise | May 22, 2011 1:28 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 22, 2011 10:36 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 22, 2011 11:00 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 22, 2011 6:03 pm | |
| Patrice Colet | May 22, 2011 8:09 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | May 22, 2011 9:21 pm | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 23, 2011 12:21 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 23, 2011 4:53 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 23, 2011 5:01 am | |
| Simon Wise | May 23, 2011 5:46 am | |
| Patrice Colet | May 23, 2011 6:20 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 23, 2011 9:09 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 23, 2011 9:37 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 24, 2011 7:29 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 24, 2011 9:13 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 26, 2011 5:57 am | |
| Andy Farnell | May 26, 2011 6:14 am | |
| tim vets | May 26, 2011 12:11 pm | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 27, 2011 12:57 am | |
| Bryan Jurish | May 27, 2011 1:08 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 27, 2011 1:24 am | |
| hard off | May 27, 2011 1:51 am | |
| Chris McCormick | May 27, 2011 7:03 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | May 28, 2011 11:08 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jun 2, 2011 10:45 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jun 2, 2011 2:33 pm | |
| Andy Farnell | Jun 20, 2011 10:03 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jun 20, 2011 6:14 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | Jun 20, 2011 6:51 pm | |
| Chris McCormick | Jun 20, 2011 6:54 pm | |
| Andy Farnell | Jun 21, 2011 12:22 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 7, 2011 12:39 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] CVs | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Bryan Jurish (jur...@uni-potsdam.de) | |
| Date: | May 19, 2011 8:11:46 am | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
On 2011-05-19 14:01, Simon Wise wrote:
That is which numbers are directly perceivable, without some more abstract mathematical mapping to guide us?
Zero ;-)
Certainly most people can look at four matches on a table and see that there are four, without doing any counting at all.
That's "four matches", not "the number four". If by "number" you mean the characteristic property of all sets of 4 elements, you're perceiving something (the matches) which has that property, but you can't directly perceive the property itself (i.e. its `intension'), because it's a function (in the mathematical sense) from all possible entities (let's ignore possible worlds for now) to a truth value indicating whether or not that entity is a set-of-four. This view is pretty unsatisfying for a number of reasons (for one thing, it doesn't work well for anything other than positive integers), but I hope it suffices to show that "the number four" can't be perceived directly. The same sort of argument goes for other "simple" qualities like volume, mass, density, color etc -- this stuff has had epistemologists tearing their hair out for centuries. There are 2 main camps, and I'm more or less solidly in the one that says "numbers exist" :-)
In some languages, where mathematics hasn't become part of the language,
huh? do you happen to know of one specifically?
and the words for numbers are pre-mathematics, counting goes something like "one, two, three, four, many"
... many one, many two, many three, many four, many many, ... many many one, many many two, many many three, many many four, ... LOTS
[courtesy of Terry Pratchett] ;-)
so I guess that backs up the idea that the first few integers are perceived directly,
Again, I take issue with the details, but yes: there's a lot of empirical evidence that human cognitive/perceptual apparatus does some specialized handling for small sets, including counting. How we get those sets to be __sets__ (as opposed to arbitrarily co-occuring random perceptual data packets) is quite another matter, and im(ns)ho a much more interesting one.
but every other number - counting numbers past that, zero, negative integers, the rest of the rational numbers, the rest of the real numbers, the rest of the complex numbers, ... and so forth are all just constructs in the language of mathematics which all happen to have some quite useful mappings to things we can observe around us. Most integers do not have any more 'existence' (however that may be defined) than complex numbers.
I'll agree that integers and complex numbers have the same sort and degree of existence, but I don't believe they're `constructs'. If forty-two trees fall in a forest and no one is around to count them, __forty-two__ trees have still fallen.
marmosets, Bryan
-- ***************************************************
Bryan Jurish Deutsches Textarchiv Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften
Jägerstr. 22/23 10117 Berlin
Tel.: +49 (0)30 20370 539 E-Mail: jur...@bbaw.de
***************************************************
_______________________________________________
Pd-l...@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list





