Re: CGE 6.3.11 is very bad performance - Jon Stephens - com.mysql.lists.cluster

3 messages in com.mysql.lists.clusterRe: CGE 6.3.11 is very bad performance

From	Sent On	Attachments
Kenji HIROHAMA	10 Apr 2008 19:04
Jon Stephens	11 Apr 2008 01:27
Kenji HIROHAMA	11 Apr 2008 01:36

Subject:	Re: CGE 6.3.11 is very bad performance
From:	Jon Stephens (jo...@mysql.com)
Date:	04/11/2008 01:27:22 AM
List:	com.mysql.lists.cluster

Kenji HIROHAMA wrote:

Hello,

We did some benchmark with mysqlslap to MySQL Cluster three different versions, which is; -mysql-5.1.23-rc-linux-x86_64-glibc23(non RPM Packege) -mysql-5.1.23-ndb-6.2.14-telco -mysql-5.1.23-ndb-6.3.11-telco

Red Hat Enterprise 5.1 server quad core*2, 16G memory

Then, only "mysql-5.1.23-ndb-6.3.11-telco" is very bad performance.

Hi Kenji,

mysql-5.1.23-ndb-6.3.11 and mysql-5.1.23-ndb-6.3.12 have been pulled from the download site due to various critical issues. Please use mysql-5.1.24-ndb-6.3.13 which was released late yesterday and is now available from ftp://ftp.mysql.com/pub/mysql/download/cluster_telco/mysql-5.1.24-ndb-6.3.13 - the changelogs in the online MySQL 5.1 Manual are being updated right now and should be complete in the next day or so.

cheers

jon.

So, my question is, is there any bugs in "mysql-5.1.23-ndb-6.3.11-telco" related to the performance?

I have checked bugs.mysql.com, but couldn't find possible ones.

"mysql-5.1.23-rc-linux-x86_64-glibc23(non RPM Packege)" and "mysql-5.1.23-ndb-6.2.14-telco" are similer performance.

Or, is there any parameters default value is changed from 6.3?

Thanks,