atom feed16 messages in org.gnome.foundation-listRe: time to (re)consider preferential...
FromSent OnAttachments
Luis VillaFeb 16, 2008 7:53 am 
Dave NearyFeb 16, 2008 8:19 am 
Jonathon JongsmaFeb 16, 2008 8:35 am 
Quim GilFeb 16, 2008 11:20 am 
Shaun McCanceFeb 16, 2008 3:47 pm 
Luis VillaFeb 17, 2008 5:32 am 
Quim GilFeb 17, 2008 11:36 am 
James HenstridgeFeb 23, 2008 5:32 pm 
Elijah NewrenFeb 23, 2008 8:10 pm 
Telsa GwynneFeb 24, 2008 12:41 am 
Shaun McCanceFeb 24, 2008 9:44 am 
James HenstridgeFeb 24, 2008 7:14 pm 
James HenstridgeFeb 25, 2008 5:08 am 
Behdad EsfahbodFeb 25, 2008 10:47 am 
Vincent UntzFeb 27, 2008 3:44 am 
Bruno BoaventuraFeb 27, 2008 2:23 pm 
Subject:Re: time to (re)consider preferential voting?
From:Behdad Esfahbod (beh@behdad.org)
Date:Feb 25, 2008 10:47:15 am
List:org.gnome.foundation-list

On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 08:41 +0000, Telsa Gwynne wrote:

Ar Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:10:23PM -0700, ysgrifennodd Elijah Newren:

At the risk of sounding like a bad person... [...] Trying to counteract this factor, I've often voted for such people that I thought would be great and would be unknown in the wider community, and omitted voting for people I liked that I knew would make it on the board anyway (often making sure to select fewer people than the maximum I was allowed). I was hoping it would even out the number of votes a little bit, and make those who didn't get elected feel more encouraged to try again.

What can be bad about this? I do this too.

That if everyone does this the results will be surprising and unstable.

Telsa

-- behdad http://behdad.org/

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759