atom feed6 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] Re: namecanvas - why depreca...
FromSent OnAttachments
Matteo Sisti SetteFeb 9, 2007 2:43 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 9, 2007 4:01 pm.pd, .pd
Chris McCormickFeb 9, 2007 6:08 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 10, 2007 12:09 am 
Chris McCormickFeb 11, 2007 4:25 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 13, 2007 5:42 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] Re: namecanvas - why deprecated?
From:Chris McCormick (chr@mccormick.cx)
Date:Feb 11, 2007 4:25:38 pm
List:at.iem.pd-list

On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 09:10:01AM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:

Chris McCormick hat gesagt: // Chris McCormick wrote:

Or maybe you're talking about something else? The namecanvas issue would be solved if each patch was given a default name like pd-$0 or somesuch.

That's what I meant: Instead of an object like [namecanvas] that can be deleted, an entry field in an abstraction's "Properties" menu would be more secure.

Ah yes of course, that's a great idea.

Chris.

------------------- chr@mccormick.cx http://mccormick.cx