atom feed57 messages in org.xwiki.usersRe: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Prop...
FromSent OnAttachments
Ecaterina ValicaMay 10, 2010 6:39 am 
Guillaume LerougeMay 10, 2010 7:01 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 10, 2010 7:07 am 
Thomas MortagneMay 10, 2010 8:21 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 13, 2010 1:56 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 18, 2010 2:03 am 
Guillaume LerougeMay 18, 2010 8:07 am 
Denis GervalleMay 18, 2010 8:28 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 19, 2010 3:23 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 19, 2010 3:39 am 
Denis GervalleMay 19, 2010 6:52 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 19, 2010 7:32 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 20, 2010 9:17 am 
Guillaume LerougeMay 20, 2010 9:21 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 21, 2010 10:51 am 
Alex BuseniusMay 21, 2010 11:41 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 21, 2010 10:57 pm 
Denis GervalleMay 22, 2010 1:31 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 26, 2010 6:48 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 27, 2010 12:57 am 
Denis GervalleMay 27, 2010 1:25 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 31, 2010 7:53 am 
Ecaterina ValicaMay 31, 2010 7:54 am 
Denis GervalleJun 1, 2010 12:03 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 1, 2010 3:54 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 3, 2010 9:08 am 
Denis GervalleJun 4, 2010 12:42 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 4, 2010 9:54 am 
Alex BuseniusJun 4, 2010 10:56 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 4, 2010 11:23 am 
Raluca StavroJun 4, 2010 11:33 am 
Raluca StavroJun 4, 2010 11:36 am 
Alex BuseniusJun 4, 2010 12:04 pm 
Denis GervalleJun 4, 2010 3:53 pm 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 7, 2010 1:22 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 7, 2010 1:50 am 
Denis GervalleJun 7, 2010 2:23 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 7, 2010 7:59 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 8, 2010 2:19 am 
Denis GervalleJun 8, 2010 3:46 am 
Raluca StavroJun 8, 2010 4:44 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 8, 2010 6:40 am 
Denis GervalleJun 8, 2010 8:13 am 
Philip BrunettiJun 8, 2010 6:53 pm 
Caleb James DeLisleJun 8, 2010 7:31 pm 
Vincent MassolJun 9, 2010 12:24 am 
Sergiu DumitriuJun 9, 2010 2:56 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 9, 2010 3:23 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 9, 2010 3:35 am 
Sergiu DumitriuJun 9, 2010 3:45 am 
Sergiu DumitriuJun 9, 2010 5:01 am 
Sergiu DumitriuJun 9, 2010 5:04 am 
Raluca StavroJun 9, 2010 8:28 am 
Raluca StavroJun 9, 2010 8:29 am 
Raluca StavroJun 9, 2010 8:31 am 
Ecaterina ValicaJun 9, 2010 10:11 am 
Denis GervalleJun 10, 2010 12:15 am 
Subject:Re: [xwiki-users] [xwiki-devs] [Proposal] Rights Management UI
From:Denis Gervalle (dg@softec.lu)
Date:Jun 8, 2010 8:13:52 am
List:org.xwiki.users

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 15:41, Ecaterina Valica <vali@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 13:46, Denis Gervalle <dg@softec.lu> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:19, Ecaterina Valica <vali@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 09:01, Denis Gervalle <dg@softec.lu> wrote:

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 17:00, Ecaterina Valica <vali@gmail.com> wrote:

It will if it display the inheritance source in a column. For

right

set

at

current level this column could even precise what inheritance has been overwritten, both in terms of allowance and origin.

Denis.

Hi Denis,

"Something" like this:

http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space

Yes, "something" like that. I would have expected a "back to basic" button in place of "advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to avoid duplicating basic rights. Maybe the menu should be horizontal in the advanced interface, I do not know. Also add some hyperlinks to upper level in the column explaining inheritance. And put the highlight of

changes

over

the rest of the row (includes name and inheritance)

http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space

About:

I would have expected a "back to basic" button in place of "advanced, and the removal of the basic interface to avoid duplicating basic rights

http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/rights52Space.png

This removal of the basic interface will be set from the user profile's variables (if it has advanced type)?

No, just removed when the advanced interface is shown using the advanced button, like you have done.

I mean if the user is advanced, all the rows will be presented in advances?

No, the only thing I proposed is that user that are not set "Advanced user" in their profile, will not be presented the advanced interface link, and will never see extended rights.

I'm asking because I think the collapsed view is great to see changes

up

in

the table, where you don't care the advanced status of those rights.

I completely agree. Advanced interface is for understanding and fixing deep complex stuffs

WDYT ? Is this interesting ?

it's nice :P I would love to see some other opinions.

Yes, could it be possible for you to fix the interactive version to hide the basics and also to have hover and click work as expected. I think it will helps in receiving more feed back with causing confusion.

Raluca offered to help me fix the interaction.

I found the result really well suited now. There is just some improvement in color contrast, icons aspect, and so on that should be applied if we get approval for this proposal.

Once you have fixed the sample, I think that a summary page (resume of our reflexion, and containing only the final proposal) and than a vote thread could be appropriate to receive feedback from other committers, since the size of this thread could be pushing back.

Yes, a summary+vote is needed.

I made a version with pagination and filters added. http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Rights51Space

PNG for the filters: collapsed:

http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/filtersCollapsed.png expanded:

http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Improvements/Rights43Proposal/filtersExpanded.png

What do you think? Could this filters be helpful? Are too powerful/complex/useless?

Not sure we really need all these. What is important for me is: - local, global, all user type, with local by default - local, inherited, implied right - user/group name filtering

The rest could be convenient, but it also takes unnecessary horizontal space, which is annoying IMO.

From an implementation point of view, can a livetable have more than one filter per a column.

No problem if we use only the .js without de livetable macro.

Anyway this will be a custom livetable, because we also need to integrate the "add user" part and the "save/reset" buttons.

Yes, it will probably be so.

Also, from an implementation point of view, should we enable multiselect (ex. to select multiple rights)?

I have made recent fixes for that in the livetable.js, so this is not a problem.

Obs. Right -> Sources -> Implicit refer to the rights that come from the setting of another right (example: admin means implicit view+edit+delete+comment; creator means implicit delete). Would this filter option be useful or it is too much?

Doesn't this also include implicit settings when no right has been set anywhere ?

Denis

Thanks,

Caty

WDYT ?

Denis

Thanks, Caty

_______________________________________________ users mailing list use@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO

_______________________________________________ devs mailing list de@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

_______________________________________________ devs mailing list de@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

-- Denis Gervalle SOFTEC sa - CEO eGuilde sarl - CTO

_______________________________________________ users mailing list use@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users