199 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-develRe: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
FromSent OnAttachments
David F Barrera06 Jul 2005 09:02 
Steven Hand06 Jul 2005 09:04 
David F Barrera06 Jul 2005 09:09 
Steven Hand06 Jul 2005 09:52 
David F Barrera06 Jul 2005 12:00 
Li Ge07 Jul 2005 09:50 
David F Barrera08 Jul 2005 08:11 
Jerone Young08 Jul 2005 09:22 
Jerone Young08 Jul 2005 09:29 
David F Barrera11 Jul 2005 08:16 
Vincent Hanquez11 Jul 2005 15:00 
Paul Larson11 Jul 2005 15:01 
Vincent Hanquez11 Jul 2005 18:10 
David F Barrera12 Jul 2005 08:12 
David F Barrera13 Jul 2005 07:32 
David F Barrera14 Jul 2005 08:42 
Li Ge15 Jul 2005 09:50 
Li Ge18 Jul 2005 09:39 
Li Ge19 Jul 2005 08:51 
Li Ge20 Jul 2005 09:25 
David F Barrera21 Jul 2005 10:39 
David F Barrera22 Jul 2005 08:34 
David F Barrera25 Jul 2005 08:24 
David F Barrera25 Jul 2005 08:36 
David F Barrera26 Jul 2005 07:18 
David F Barrera27 Jul 2005 07:50 
David F Barrera28 Jul 2005 10:11 
David F Barrera29 Jul 2005 08:33 
David F Barrera01 Aug 2005 11:13 
Steven Hand02 Aug 2005 03:20 
David F Barrera02 Aug 2005 14:43 
Li Ge03 Aug 2005 12:43 
Li Ge04 Aug 2005 09:46 
Li Ge04 Aug 2005 12:27 
Li Ge05 Aug 2005 09:49 
Li Ge08 Aug 2005 10:36 
Li Ge09 Aug 2005 13:33 
Li Ge10 Aug 2005 09:53 
Ian Pratt10 Aug 2005 10:07 
Li Ge10 Aug 2005 10:33.gif, .gif, .gif
Li Ge11 Aug 2005 11:43 
Li Ge12 Aug 2005 10:17 
David F Barrera15 Aug 2005 12:23 
Ian Pratt15 Aug 2005 12:41 
David F Barrera15 Aug 2005 13:20 
Ian Pratt15 Aug 2005 13:45 
David F Barrera15 Aug 2005 14:38 
Ian Pratt15 Aug 2005 14:48 
You, Yongkang15 Aug 2005 21:40 
David F Barrera16 Aug 2005 12:47 
David F Barrera17 Aug 2005 11:25 
David F Barrera18 Aug 2005 11:38 
Li Ge18 Aug 2005 12:46.gif, .gif, .gif
146 later messages
Subject:Re: [Xen-devel] Daily Xen Builds
From:David F Barrera (df@us.ibm.com)
Date:07/06/2005 09:09:08 AM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-devel

Let me know if you want me to test the patch, too.

On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 17:04 +0100, Steven Hand wrote:

* Error messages displayed when creating DomU: XENBUS xXENBUS xs_read_watch: -5 * Happens when memory is set to '256' * Use other memory parameters as workaround (e.g. 128, 512)

We know what this is -- I'm testing a patch currently.

cheers,

S.

"The wisest men follow their own direction. " Euripides