9 messages in com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy[sqlalchemy] Re: Problems with Oracle...
FromSent OnAttachments
Brandon Goldfedder23 May 2008 12:09 
Brandon Goldfedder23 May 2008 14:21 
Michael Bayer23 May 2008 16:55 
Brandon Goldfedder23 May 2008 19:02 
Michael Bayer24 May 2008 06:57 
Brandon Goldfedder24 May 2008 15:33 
Michael Bayer24 May 2008 16:36 
Brandon Goldfedder24 May 2008 17:20 
Michael Bayer24 May 2008 19:40 
Subject:[sqlalchemy] Re: Problems with Oracle Express/sqlalchemy
From:Michael Bayer (mike@zzzcomputing.com)
Date:05/24/2008 06:57:16 AM
List:com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy

On May 23, 2008, at 10:02 PM, Brandon Goldfedder wrote:

Michael, Yes - that is what I am doing now : ForeignKey("schemaname.tablename.colname")

and I have things working. (see example 3). My problem is these steps seem really ugly and a lot more work than it should be to get things working portably and reliably - thus my question on if this is best practice or not.

no, what you had there is crazy. send an example case (just the plain tables and their relationships, none of the "extra" stuff you did) so we can fully see what you'd like to achieve.