9 messages in com.perforce.perforce-userFwd: Tools for detecting whitespace-o...
FromSent OnAttachments
Rich...@geodesic.com26 May 1999 13:39 
Nick...@pobox.com27 May 1999 04:36 
Davi...@home.chat.net30 May 1999 03:12 
Jeff...@pobox.com30 May 1999 08:22 
Davi...@home.chat.net30 May 1999 13:45 
WesP...@softweyr.com30 May 1999 18:19 
Jeff...@pobox.com30 May 1999 23:42 
Fred...@mydata.se31 May 1999 03:47 
Nick...@pobox.com31 May 1999 07:07 
Subject:Fwd: Tools for detecting whitespace-only differences
From:Nick...@pobox.com (Nick@pobox.com)
Date:05/27/1999 04:36:54 AM
List:com.perforce.perforce-user

At 1999-05-26 20:39:35+0000, Richard Brooksby writes:

We frequently merging codelines in which the whitespace has been changed, or tabs have been accidentally expanded or contracted. Whitespace changes confuse the "resolve" command so that it sees conflicts where there really aren't any.

For what it is worth, I think it is usually a mistake to ignore whitespace conflict. Whitespace is there for a reason, and the amount and kind of whitespace is what it is for a reason. These reasons are usually but not always concerned with code clarity. Ignoring changes to whitespace amounts to saying "those reasons are unimportant". Changing whitespace also breaks semantics in various programming languages.

This is not to say that a tool to remove whitespace conflicts is worthless, just that its use carries various risks of which the user should be aware.

Nick B