25 messages in com.mysql.lists.plusplusRe: License Question
FromSent OnAttachments
Hardy, Allan08 Nov 2005 16:11 
Chris Frey08 Nov 2005 16:25 
Hardy, Allan08 Nov 2005 18:20 
Chris Frey08 Nov 2005 19:19 
Warren Young09 Nov 2005 05:05 
Warren Young09 Nov 2005 05:08 
Hardy, Allan09 Nov 2005 10:02 
Hardy, Allan09 Nov 2005 10:12 
Warren Young09 Nov 2005 10:12 
Hardy, Allan09 Nov 2005 10:29 
Warren Young09 Nov 2005 10:47 
Chris Frey09 Nov 2005 10:51 
Hardy, Allan09 Nov 2005 10:58 
Chris Frey09 Nov 2005 11:00 
Hardy, Allan09 Nov 2005 11:01 
Hardy, Allan09 Nov 2005 11:03 
Warren Young09 Nov 2005 11:52 
Warren Young09 Nov 2005 11:55 
Chris Frey09 Nov 2005 12:49 
Hardy, Allan09 Nov 2005 13:00 
Warren Young09 Nov 2005 13:13 
Chris Frey09 Nov 2005 13:15 
Hardy, Allan09 Nov 2005 13:24 
Hardy, Allan09 Nov 2005 13:46 
mysq...@etr-usa.com10 Nov 2005 12:10.txt
Subject:Re: License Question
From:Chris Frey (cdf@foursquare.net)
Date:11/09/2005 01:15:08 PM
List:com.mysql.lists.plusplus

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:01:19PM -0500, Hardy, Allan wrote:

Actually I am not clear on how a derived work of an GPL product can be licensed under LGPL? I asked them about that as well. (I didn't ask them directly but since MySQL++ was originally calling LGPL MySQL, now that MySQL has changed to GPL, doesn't MySQL++ need to)

No. mysql++ is a separate library, authored separatedly, and has no need to change its license because someone else does. We don't distribute mysql code.

The LGPL allows you to change the license to GPL (section 3). I believe this is what allows LGPL to link against GPL.

If I'm correct (consult a lawyer) the Prop -> LGPL -> GPL equation becomes: Prop -> GPL -> GPL ... which doesn't work.

If I get any response from FSF I will update you all if interested

I'd be interested. Feel free to email me privately if you don't want to add it to the list... although by now, it's probably a good idea to finish this thread with an official word if we get it. :-)

- Chris