15 messages in com.mysql.lists.clusterRe: All about Carrier Grade Edition
FromSent OnAttachments
Gaël Marmillod06 Jul 2007 08:52 
Brian Moon06 Jul 2007 10:01 
Stewart Smith06 Jul 2007 18:41 
Adam Dixon06 Jul 2007 19:00 
Brian Moon07 Jul 2007 12:25 
Stewart Smith08 Jul 2007 05:39 
Gaël Marmillod09 Jul 2007 05:51 
Stewart Smith10 Jul 2007 04:08 
Robin Bowes10 Jul 2007 05:18 
Gaël Marmillod10 Jul 2007 05:23 
Anatoly Pidruchny10 Jul 2007 05:26 
Robin Bowes10 Jul 2007 05:28 
Stewart Smith10 Jul 2007 21:02 
Andrew Hutchings10 Jul 2007 23:59 
Stewart Smith13 Jul 2007 01:42 
Subject:Re: All about Carrier Grade Edition
From:Stewart Smith (stew@mysql.com)
Date:07/13/2007 01:42:12 AM
List:com.mysql.lists.cluster

On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 06:59 +0000, Andrew Hutchings wrote:

In article <1184126553.13424.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>stew@mysql.co m (Stewart Smith) wrote:

Since customers need to both deploy and test, we have several versions of CGE... some for stable use, some for ongoing testing and development. Different CGE versions are kept at different stages of up-to-dateness with the main 5.1 tree... so bugs fixed in MySQL 5.1.X may or may not make it into a CGE release. The latest CGE release is usually keptrather up to date with main 5.1 though.

I had a look at CGE the other day and I think going to push my employer to let me implement that instead of standard 5.1. My boss has a rule of 'no beta software', and I can't really get him to understand that NDB in 5.1 late betas will be more stable for us than 5.0 currently is, and it will add all the features specified from the beginning. In terms of reliability, stability, betaness, etc... How does CGE compare with standard 5.1?

It depends on the CGE version. Some series are for testing, some for deployment... the manual is/should be up to date on this.

Jumpstart your cluster: http://www.mysql.com/consulting/packaged/cluster.html