Hello.
On Mon 2002-12-09 at 08:17:41 -0600, Carl...@billingconcepts.com wrote:
I know that the slave will honor transactions but how does that effect the
STOP SLAVE command? Based on your note, I'm assuming (Oh, that nasty word!)
that if the stop slave is issued in the middle of a transaction it will roll
back.
Correct. The change of 3.23.52 was what was needed to make SLAVE STOP
honor (full) transactions.
I'm also assuming that the pointer for the bin-log will now point to
the begining of the transaction that was rolled back.
Unfortunately no. This what my last remark (in the other mail) was
about and what Heikki also pointed out in his mails. Since the
developers are now aware of the problem, I think we can look forward
for a early bugfix.
HTH,
Benjamin.