7 messages in com.googlegroups.bloggerdevRe: [bloggerDev] Re: ANN: Blogger GDa...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Pete Hopkins ☠ | 13 Mar 2007 16:55 | |
| danielpunkass | 15 Mar 2007 10:14 | |
| Pete Hopkins ☠ | 16 Mar 2007 07:36 | |
| danielpunkass | 16 Mar 2007 09:09 | |
| loghound (John McLaughlin) | 26 Apr 2007 13:34 | |
| loghound (John McLaughlin) | 26 Apr 2007 20:59 | |
| Pete Hopkins ☠ | 27 Apr 2007 13:05 |
| Subject: | Re: [bloggerDev] Re: ANN: Blogger GData now with orderby parameter |
|---|---|
| From: | Pete Hopkins ☠ (phop...@google.com) |
| Date: | 03/16/2007 07:36:01 AM |
| List: | com.googlegroups.bloggerdev |
On 3/15/07, danielpunkass <jal...@gmail.com> wrote:
Great! I didn't request this, but I can tell my users are going to be happy with it, since MarsEdit tends to organize things in a "by published" order.
Did I interpret things naively? I just tried tacking the parameter to the end of the GET URL for the feed (an approach that I later noticed is endorsed by the GData documentation). This gave me the following URL (for instance):
http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2742621948488638421/posts/default?orderby=published
But when I fetch that URL, I am seeing a 400 result code with response text:
Invalid parameter: "orderby".
Is it possible the new feature hasn't propogated out to the public feeds yet? Or am I doing something wrong?
It looks like the old Blogger proxying / redirecting GData implementation is barfing on the new parameter.
Either use www2 directly or use the Blog*Spot feeds for now.
Sorry for the confusion.
-- Pete
On Mar 13, 7:55pm, "Pete Hopkins ☠" <phop...@google.com> wrote:
Today we released a much-requested feature for Blogger's GData feeds: the orderby parameter.
Now you can add orderby=published or orderby=updated to a GData query to get the posts sorted in that order.
Some notes: - updated is the default - This has no effect on comments feeds, whose updated and published dates are the same - Pagination in the by-updated feed is limited to the most recently published 500 posts. We hope to eventually remove this limitation.
-- Pete