 | Start a set with this search |
 | Include this search in one of my sets |
 | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
 | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
 | Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
13 messages in org.python.pythonmac-sig[Pythonmac-SIG] .pydistutils.cfg (was...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Mike Hansen | Jan 4, 2005 3:40 am | |
| Robert Kern | Jan 4, 2005 4:25 am | |
| Bob Ippolito | Jan 4, 2005 5:13 am | |
| Robert Kern | Jan 4, 2005 5:57 am | |
| Bob Ippolito | Jan 4, 2005 6:03 am | |
| Robert Kern | Jan 4, 2005 7:11 am | |
| Jack Jansen | Jan 4, 2005 2:09 pm | |
| Bob Ippolito | Jan 4, 2005 2:42 pm | |
| Bob Ippolito | Jan 4, 2005 2:50 pm | |
| Ronald Oussoren | Jan 4, 2005 3:18 pm | |
| Jack Jansen | Jan 4, 2005 10:17 pm | |
| Bob Ippolito | Jan 4, 2005 10:30 pm | |
| Mike Hansen | Jan 5, 2005 2:56 am |
| Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [Pythonmac-SIG] .pydistutils.cfg (was: pychecker) | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jack Jansen (Jack...@cwi.nl) | |
| Date: | Jan 4, 2005 10:17:00 pm | |
| List: | org.python.pythonmac-sig | |
On 4-jan-05, at 14:42, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Jan 4, 2005, at 8:09 AM, Jack Jansen wrote:
I'd never even heard of .pydistutils.cfg. I've added a note to the FAQ pointing to it.
It has some more features in Python 2.4, you can use it to add new build command packages to distutils out-of-tree (like py2app, bdist_mpkg, etc.). Of course, very few distutils extensions are implemented in away that is compatible with this new feature, but it's there and I'll probably end up making py2app and bdist_mpkg compatible.
Interesting... Although: you only need py2app and bdist_mpkg on the supplier-side (right?), so it doesn't really buy us all that much except a bit of convenience.
Then I looked at the distutils code, and noticed that there's also an optional distutils.cfg inside the package. So that made me wonder: we could install a symlink in /System/yaddayaddayadda/lib/python2.3/distutils/distutils.cfg that points to, say, /Library/Python/2.3/distutils.cfg, and put an (admin-editable) file there that directs scripts tot the right place system wide (/usr/local/bin by default, probably).
+1 on the idea +1 for /usr/local/bin as the "right place"
Not so sure about install-data pointing to /usr/local/share (earlier on in the thread), because some packages might try and locate their data files using means other than distutils (sys.prefix relative).
Yeah, I was wondering about that one too. I'll leave it out, if the end user wants it s/he can edit the file.
Another thing that would be nice is to have some admin-writable place to put header files (in addition to Python's own headers) too. But that would require a patch to distutils and might need to happen in the 2.5 tree.
[EVIL GRIN] What happens if we set both "include_dirs" and "headers" to, say, /Library/Python/2.3/python-includes in distutils.cfg? We'd need a bit of extra glue for PackMan binary installs (so it sends include files there too), but if this would cause include files to be installed there *and* that directory added to the -I flags we'd be all set, I think... -- Jack Jansen, <Jack...@cwi.nl>, http://www.cwi.nl/~jack If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma Goldman