14 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Question about courie...
FromSent OnAttachments
Thomas von HasselApr 17, 2003 7:59 am 
Branko F. GračnarApr 17, 2003 11:02 am 
Bi...@triligon.orgApr 17, 2003 11:58 am 
Thomas von HasselApr 17, 2003 12:42 pm 
Branko F. GračnarApr 18, 2003 2:22 am 
Thomas von HasselApr 20, 2003 4:06 pm 
Sam VarshavchikApr 20, 2003 5:04 pm 
Bi...@triligon.orgApr 22, 2003 8:31 am 
Bi...@triligon.orgApr 22, 2003 8:32 am 
Thomas von HasselApr 22, 2003 10:13 am 
Bi...@triligon.orgApr 22, 2003 10:24 am 
Thomas von HasselApr 22, 2003 11:01 am 
Mitch (WebCob)Apr 23, 2003 6:14 am 
Mitch (WebCob)Apr 23, 2003 7:46 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[courier-users] Question about courier startupActions...
From:Mitch (WebCob) (mit@webcob.com)
Date:Apr 23, 2003 7:46:06 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

I see processes on my list like:

root 30262 0.0 0.0 624 448 ?? I 12:45PM 0:00.01 /bin/sh -c ./courieruucp root 30263 0.0 0.0 624 448 ?? I 12:45PM 0:00.01 /bin/sh -c ./courierlocal root 30265 0.0 0.0 624 448 ?? I 12:45PM 0:00.01 /bin/sh -c ./courierfax root 30267 0.0 0.0 624 448 ?? I 12:45PM 0:00.01 /bin/sh -c ./courieresmtp root 30268 0.0 0.0 624 448 ?? I 12:45PM 0:00.01 /bin/sh -c ./courierdsn

Is there a reason these weren't

/bin/sh -c 'exec ./REALPROG'

It may not be much but why marshall accross that extra process and waste that bit of memory if not needed?

Or am I WAY off base in my understanding of sh?

Or is there a good reason to do it this way?

Thanks.

m/

-----Original Message----- From: Mitch (WebCob) [mailto:mit@webcob.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 5:56 AM To: Thomas von Hassel; Bi@triligon.org; cour@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [courier-users] FreeBSD port.

Nope. IPv6 on FreeBSD doesn't work - at least I never found a way to make it. For one thing (IIRC) it tries to access name services on a v6 address - which many name servers don't support yet. Those name services are of course essential, so it tanks.

m/

-----Original Message----- From: cour@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:cour@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Thomas von Hassel Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 11:01 AM To: Bi@triligon.org; cour@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [courier-users] FreeBSD port.

On 22/04/03 19:22, "Bi@triligon.org" <Bi@triligon.org> wrote:

In <BACB@elements.dk>, on 04/22/03 at 07:10 PM, Thomas von Hassel <tho@elements.dk> said:

*SNIP*

I got it working by grabbing the latest dev. Tarball and just start over. Now it seems to work, but I cannot tell what I might have done differently, except disabling IPv6 support during configure.

THere has been much discussion about IVP6 not (yet) working as it should. What level of FreeBSd are you running on?

4.6 ... I just realised that my production server runs 4.7 and my test box runs 4.6 ...maybe that's the problem ?

/thomas

-- itunes isn't playing right now

_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list cour@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users