atom feed37 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: Importing lukemftpd
FromSent OnAttachments
Mike HeffnerJul 16, 2001 6:24 pm 
Dima DorfmanJul 16, 2001 10:33 pm 
Dan MoschukJul 17, 2001 10:22 am 
Kris KennawayJul 17, 2001 10:35 am 
Mike HeffnerJul 17, 2001 4:01 pm 
Mike HeffnerJul 17, 2001 4:29 pm 
Greg LeheyJul 18, 2001 12:53 am 
Alfred PerlsteinJul 18, 2001 1:04 am 
Dan MoschukJul 18, 2001 11:50 am 
Dan MoschukJul 18, 2001 11:51 am 
Mike HeffnerJul 18, 2001 8:50 pm 
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 2:33 am 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 11:21 am.patch, .patch
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 12:29 pm 
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 12:30 pm 
Mike HeffnerJul 19, 2001 2:46 pm 
Mike HeffnerJul 19, 2001 3:34 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 3:54 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 3:57 pm 
Mike SmithJul 19, 2001 4:04 pm 
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 4:37 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 8:30 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 8:36 pm 
David O'BrienJul 19, 2001 8:39 pm 
Kris KennawayJul 19, 2001 9:03 pm 
Terry LambertJul 20, 2001 9:34 am 
Dima DorfmanJul 20, 2001 10:14 am 
David O'BrienJul 20, 2001 11:22 am 
Mike HeffnerJul 21, 2001 9:11 pm 
Assar WesterlundJul 22, 2001 2:07 pm 
Warner LoshJul 23, 2001 3:20 pm 
Assar WesterlundJul 24, 2001 1:16 pm.diff
Mike HeffnerJul 24, 2001 5:55 pm 
Assar WesterlundJul 24, 2001 6:07 pm 
Mike HeffnerJul 24, 2001 8:41 pm 
David O'BrienJul 27, 2001 10:19 am 
Kris KennawayJul 27, 2001 12:07 pm 
Subject:Re: Importing lukemftpd
From:Kris Kennaway (kr@obsecurity.org)
Date:Jul 27, 2001 12:07:32 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 10:19:54AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:03:33PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:

You and John are being paid to work full-time on FreeBSD, and the projects you mentioned are projects you do during your >8 hours a day of paid FreeBSD hacking time. If you were working on these in your own time, say from 10pm at night after a hard day at work,

When we work >8 hours a day, we *are* working on XYZ in our own time. :-)

And the project thanks you for it ;-)

but the deeply embedded ones which rely on interactions between several different parts of the code. That requires someone to sit down for a week and really become intimate with the code, which isn't something that most people can do in their spare time for an hour or two here and there (which is why no-one's done this so far).

Who do you trust to do this review? Me? Anybody? Only members of the S.O. team? Any of the typical contributors to -audit? Surely given your stance on this issue, just anyone coming forward saying they've "audited" the code will appease you.

I'd want to be convinced that a thorough job has been spent looking for problems -- ultimately it comes down to someone I trust saying "I've gone through the code thoroughly and didn't find any more problems". A good indicator of this will probably be patches fixing problems in the code discovered during the audit :-)

Kris