atom feed18 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Re: webmail and w...
FromSent OnAttachments
Alexander SkwarJun 23, 2002 3:43 pm 
Juha SaarinenJun 23, 2002 4:04 pm 
Alexander SkwarJun 23, 2002 4:41 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJun 23, 2002 6:52 pm 
Alexander SkwarJun 24, 2002 1:58 am 
Juha SaarinenJun 24, 2002 2:22 am 
Alexander SkwarJun 24, 2002 2:43 am 
Alexander SkwarJun 24, 2002 3:18 am 
Sam VarshavchikJun 24, 2002 7:57 am 
Sam VarshavchikJun 24, 2002 7:58 am 
Alexander SkwarJun 24, 2002 10:33 am 
Sam VarshavchikJun 24, 2002 2:11 pm 
Alexander SkwarJun 24, 2002 3:20 pm 
Juha SaarinenJun 24, 2002 3:43 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJun 24, 2002 3:47 pm 
Alexander SkwarJun 25, 2002 1:14 am 
Sam VarshavchikJun 25, 2002 4:26 am 
Alexander SkwarJun 25, 2002 1:01 pm.diff
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Re: webmail and webadmin require %{cgibindir}
From:Alexander Skwar (ASk@DigitalProjects.com)
Date:Jun 24, 2002 2:43:41 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

So sprach Juha Saarinen am 2002-06-24 um 21:21:52 +1200 :

As I said in an earlier off-list email to you, I think you're looking at a Mandrake bug (ie. that no package "owns" /var/www/cgi-bin even though it appears that "apache-common" created it).

And as I said, it doesn't matter if a package creates a directory. It only matters if it provides it, by either explicitly stating Proivdes: /var/www/cgi-bin or by having %{dir} /var/www/cgi-bin in the %files list.

Besides: What's the value in requiring /var/www/cgi-bin? The package already Requires: apache by requiring /var/www/html.

I don't see the value in dropping openssl-perl either, as the package

The value is, that there's no openssl-perl package.

Sam probably hasn't the time to provide SPEC files for other RPM-based distributions like Mandrake and SuSE. If you do, go for it.

Well, the SPEC can easily be adopted for Mandrake by dropping the Requires: for /var/www/cgi-bin and openssl-perl. This way, it will work for RedHat and Mandrake. Don't know about SuSE.