Am Sonntag 01 Januar 2006 20:09 schrieb ydeg...@free.fr:

hahaha, lol ..... youre cute ....

i see the term "osc" and such on many hardware synths too, for example. i see that in really old circuit diagrams as well. i see that also in many other generic audio software as well. now, who did corrupt which word from whom first?

or are you refering to stuff like copying methods and concepts, so that the result just looks like the original? you know that sco says that as well?

but maybe you are uncomfortable that people build upon other peoples effort, just to speed up development? yes? so no computer should have been invented, because it uses the priciple of electricity all over the place, which was "invented" by someone else before. even a light bulb shouldnt be ok then.

i still dont see what you are complaining about. because two different things refer to the same terms? hell, pd uses stuff like for(), if ... else ... all over the place. should it be considered just a corrupted c now? should miller say "i dismiss all my copyrights on that because i use c words, kernigham&richie should be honoured instead!" ?

so, what do you mean exactly?

chris