Hi Bil,

I concur with the comments made by others. The logic of the 'sort by rating' function would be the highest star rating first, for example:

In a portfolio of work where you had - 1 model with 10 x 5 star ratings (50 stars) 1 model with 8 x 5 star ratings (40 stars) 3 models with 5 x 5 star ratings (25 stars each) 3 models with no ratings

Then the sort by rating function should place these into a descending order except where models with the same star rating would be placed in date order - so the list order would as above.

I don't think this is a big deal, just irritating because it's not working in the manner it's supposed to. You can check this by selecting any collection of work by any author who has rated models, then checking all three rating systems against one another to see how the lists are reassessed.

Thanks for your interest.

Cheers

Elvis