4 messages in com.canoo.lists.webtest[Webtest] Re: WebTest Result Viewer: ...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Roman Moukhine [ram] | 03 Aug 2004 10:51 | |
| Dierk Koenig | 04 Aug 2004 07:22 | |
| Roman Moukhine [ram] | 04 Aug 2004 14:10 | |
| Dierk Koenig | 07 Aug 2004 09:15 |
| Subject: | [Webtest] Re: WebTest Result Viewer: UVC vs. Applet |
|---|---|
| From: | Roman Moukhine [ram] (rams...@hotmail.com) |
| Date: | 08/04/2004 02:10:53 PM |
| List: | com.canoo.lists.webtest |
Hello Dierk
1-st Sorry about misspelling of ULC.
2-d
Do you have any special reason for preferring the Applet solution?
Technically I don't know how far advanced ULC as a "thing client". You are right
about transfering item only which are requested by client. This could save time
and traffic.
I'm worring as well about licence. WebTools is an open source project. It would
be nice to have all tools around at least "share ware or free".
best regards - ram
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dierk Koenig" <dier...@canoo.com> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.canoo.webtest Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:22 PM Subject: RE: WebTest Result Viewer: UVC vs. Applet
Well,
first, it's ULC not UVC (stands for Ultra Light Client).
second, this application is targeted at situations where you have a large number of possibly large resultfiles to explore. These files reside on the server.
ULC allows to _transparently_ have only those items sent to the client that the user currently explores (lazy loading).
Do you have any special reason for preferring the Applet solution?
cheers Mittie
-----Original Message----- From: webt...@lists.canoo.com [mailto:webt...@lists.canoo.com]On Behalf Of Roman Moukhine [ram] Sent: Dienstag, 3. August 2004 19:51 To: webt...@lists.canoo.com Subject: [Webtest] WebTest Result Viewer: UVC vs. Applet
Hello everybody
WebTest Result Viewer is simple "presentation only" application. Why with UVC? Could it be that java applet (with Swing or even though with AWT) suit better?
best regards - ramYzjm~y