atom feed30 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.dssRE: [dss] EPM postmark
FromSent OnAttachments
Juan Carlos CruellasJun 18, 2003 6:47 am 
Trevor PerrinJun 18, 2003 7:01 pm 
Juan Carlos CruellasJun 19, 2003 12:41 am 
Juan Carlos CruellasJun 19, 2003 12:45 am 
Trevor PerrinJun 19, 2003 3:22 pm 
Juan Carlos CruellasJun 20, 2003 3:47 am 
Trevor PerrinJun 20, 2003 8:14 pm 
Juan Carlos CruellasJun 25, 2003 3:01 am 
Nick PopeJun 25, 2003 4:11 am 
Gray SteveJun 25, 2003 4:38 am.doc
Trevor PerrinJun 25, 2003 10:16 am 
Trevor PerrinJun 25, 2003 10:39 am 
Trevor PerrinJun 25, 2003 11:46 am 
Nick PopeJun 26, 2003 10:03 am 
Trevor PerrinJun 30, 2003 2:10 am 
jmessingJun 30, 2003 7:03 am 
Nick PopeJun 30, 2003 7:22 am.pdf
Trevor PerrinJun 30, 2003 4:22 pm 
Juan Carlos CruellasJul 1, 2003 3:19 am 
Nick PopeJul 1, 2003 5:43 am 
Trevor PerrinJul 1, 2003 5:52 pm 
jmessingJul 1, 2003 6:51 pm 
Trevor PerrinJul 1, 2003 8:14 pm 
Nick PopeJul 2, 2003 2:50 am 
Trevor PerrinJul 2, 2003 1:36 pm 
Trevor PerrinJul 2, 2003 2:08 pm 
Gray SteveJul 3, 2003 10:12 am 
Trevor PerrinJul 3, 2003 1:41 pm 
Trevor PerrinJul 3, 2003 4:26 pm 
Juan Carlos CruellasJul 8, 2003 3:26 am 
Subject:RE: [dss] EPM postmark
From:jmessing (jmes@law-on-line.com)
Date:Jul 1, 2003 6:51:23 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.dss

Depending on the type of service, it might add validation data and then timestamp, or timestamp as a way of asserting validity, or just add validation data, in which case the client could then call another service to get a time-stamp.

Or just report the results of a validation event as of a particular date and time under its digital signature, if the relying party will accept this statement as a certification from a trusted third party, even without a timestamp.

Is this possibility covered somewhere else in the requirements document?