atom feed28 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: additional queue macro
FromSent OnAttachments
Jonathan LemonJul 2, 2002 7:53 am 
W Gerald HicksJul 2, 2002 8:08 am 
Ian DowseJul 2, 2002 8:12 am 
Garrett WollmanJul 2, 2002 9:53 am 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 12:58 pm 
Jonathan LemonJul 2, 2002 1:34 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 1:47 pm 
Terry LambertJul 2, 2002 3:43 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 4:07 pm 
Garrett WollmanJul 2, 2002 4:26 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 4:35 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 4:54 pm 
Terry LambertJul 2, 2002 5:02 pm 
Terry LambertJul 2, 2002 5:05 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 5:50 pm 
Bruce EvansJul 2, 2002 11:57 pm 
Terry LambertJul 3, 2002 10:37 am 
Garance A DrosihnJul 3, 2002 10:46 am 
Neal FachanJul 3, 2002 1:46 pm.diff
Julian ElischerJul 3, 2002 4:04 pm 
Neal FachanJul 3, 2002 5:12 pm 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 6:27 am 
Julian ElischerJul 4, 2002 8:36 am 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 10:07 am 
Julian ElischerJul 4, 2002 10:33 am 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 11:29 am 
Julian ElischerJul 4, 2002 11:40 am 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 12:23 pm 
Subject:Re: additional queue macro
From:Garrett Wollman (woll@lcs.mit.edu)
Date:Jul 2, 2002 4:26:00 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

<<On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:07:36 -0700 (PDT), Julian Elischer <jul@elischer.org>
said:

I would by the way argue that the statement "The queue macros always guaranteed that traversal was safe in the presence of deletions" to be false. Nowhere was this guaranteed, in fact the Manual page goes to lengths to NOT do this..

I'm fairly certain that this *was* documented somewhere, at some point in time, although I can't find it in rev. 1.1 of either the documentation or the code. Perhaps it was in a book (Stevens 2?).

-GAWollman

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message