35 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Re: Weird problem(?)| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 5:59 am | |
| Toni Mattila | Jan 3, 2002 6:21 am | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 6:32 am | |
| Toni Mattila | Jan 3, 2002 6:34 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 2:39 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 2:39 pm | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 3:22 pm | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 3:23 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 3:30 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 3:31 pm | |
| David | Jan 3, 2002 3:32 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Jan 3, 2002 3:37 pm | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 4:11 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Jan 3, 2002 4:15 pm | |
| Joe Croft | Jan 3, 2002 5:20 pm | |
| Michael Carmack | Jan 3, 2002 5:44 pm | |
| Greg Owen | Jan 3, 2002 6:29 pm | |
| Peter C. Norton | Jan 3, 2002 7:13 pm | |
| Michael Carmack | Jan 3, 2002 7:48 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 8:48 pm | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 4, 2002 12:32 am | |
| Zon Hisham Z.Abidin | Jan 4, 2002 12:57 am | |
| Francois PHILIPPO | Jan 4, 2002 1:27 am | |
| MH - Entwicklung | Jan 4, 2002 3:05 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 4, 2002 5:09 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 4, 2002 5:10 am | |
| Roger Thomas | Jan 4, 2002 5:58 am | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 4, 2002 6:13 am | |
| MH - Entwicklung | Jan 4, 2002 9:26 am | |
| Tony Kueh | Jan 4, 2002 11:05 am | |
| Robert L Mathews | Jan 4, 2002 11:09 am | |
| Peter C. Norton | Jan 4, 2002 11:51 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 4, 2002 6:20 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 4, 2002 6:21 pm | |
| MH - Entwicklung | Jan 7, 2002 1:13 am |
| Subject: | [courier-users] Re: Weird problem(?) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Sam Varshavchik (mrs...@courier-mta.com) | |
| Date: | Jan 4, 2002 6:20:42 pm | |
| List: | net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users | |
Robert L Mathews writes:
Here's a file. Go ahead, use stat(), and try to calculate the size of the message with an extra CR tacked on at the end of each line.
Once this information is calculated, is it cached anywhere so that the next mailbox access can use it without re-reading the file?
It's not and this is certainly a valid suggestion.
If it's re-reading each message, it would seem a dramatic speed improvement could be obtained by caching the size for later use, perhaps by renaming the file, while still remaining RFC 1939-compliant. I know that Maildir++ stores the size of the message in the name as "xxxx,S=nnnnn", but it unfortunately stores the size as reported by stat(), and not the CRLF octet size.
I still believe people should simply not create 100MB POP3 mailboxes. POP3 is simply the wrong tool for handling so much mail.
-- Sam