atom feed29 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.officeRe: [office] Table Refresh Delay
FromSent OnAttachments
Richard SchwerdtfegerJul 12, 2008 8:52 am 
Duane NickullJul 12, 2008 8:30 pm 
Richard SchwerdtfegerJul 14, 2008 11:31 am.gif, .gif, .gif, 7 more
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 14, 2008 1:48 pm 
Duane NickullJul 14, 2008 2:21 pm 
Richard SchwerdtfegerJul 16, 2008 10:55 am.gif, .gif, .gif, 7 more
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 16, 2008 11:36 am 
Richard SchwerdtfegerJul 17, 2008 4:46 pm.gif, .gif, .gif, 7 more
Malte TimmermannJul 18, 2008 2:07 am 
Dave PawsonJul 18, 2008 3:49 am 
Richard SchwerdtfegerJul 18, 2008 6:26 am.gif, .gif, .gif, 7 more
Duane NickullJul 18, 2008 9:23 am.gif, .gif, .gif, 6 more
Peter KornJul 18, 2008 10:36 am 
Duane NickullJul 18, 2008 11:12 am 
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 18, 2008 11:50 am 
Warren TurkalJul 18, 2008 1:28 pm 
Duane NickullJul 18, 2008 1:58 pm 
Warren TurkalJul 18, 2008 2:03 pm 
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 18, 2008 2:12 pm 
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 18, 2008 3:30 pm 
Peter KornJul 18, 2008 3:44 pm 
Duane NickullJul 18, 2008 4:10 pm 
Warren TurkalJul 18, 2008 4:41 pm 
Dave PawsonJul 18, 2008 11:00 pm 
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 19, 2008 7:30 am 
Richard SchwerdtfegerJul 20, 2008 6:16 am.gif, .gif, .gif, 7 more
Dave PawsonJul 20, 2008 6:34 am 
Peter KornJul 20, 2008 2:19 pm 
Malte TimmermannJul 21, 2008 5:35 am 
Subject:Re: [office] Table Refresh Delay
From:Duane Nickull (dnic@adobe.com)
Date:Jul 18, 2008 11:12:30 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.office

Title: Re: [office] Table Refresh Delay

The main point is that implementors have control when implementing the specification vs. being constrained by the spec. Let's not put weightless restrictions into the specification.

Duane

On 18/07/08 10:35 AM, "Peter Korn" <Pete@Sun.COM> wrote:

Hi Dave,

In OpenOffice.org we have the ability to turn animation off.  I agree with Malte; we shouldn't prevent the expression of fast animation for those who want it, but we should enable users to not have it displayed to them.

Regards,

Peter Korn Accessibility Architect, Sun Microsystems, Inc.

2008/7/18 Malte Timmermann <mailto:Malt@sun.com> :

I don't agree on "require user agents to limit this to no more than 3 times a second".

I must admit that I don't believe a higher frequency would make any sense for anything, but People have different needs, and if someone for what every reason needs a higher frequency, the application should be allowed to support this.

Strongly disagree Malte.

If there is a riks of causing an epeleptic fit, then I'd like to see a 'shall' statement in the standard requiring nothing more than 3 times per second.

Peoples needs are my concern too.

regards

-- ********************************************************************** Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc. Duane's World TV Show - http://www.duanesworldtv.org/ Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury Adobe MAX 2008 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/08/adobe-max-2008.html **********************************************************************