19 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: Is mod_php walking on its road?
FromSent OnAttachments
Steve ChuOct 23, 2007 2:01 am 
Aleksandar LazicOct 23, 2007 2:12 am 
Igor SysoevOct 23, 2007 2:15 am 
marc...@public.gmane.orgOct 23, 2007 2:24 am 
Alejandro VartabedianOct 23, 2007 2:42 am 
Manlio PerilloOct 23, 2007 2:46 am 
Igor SysoevOct 23, 2007 3:03 am 
Igor SysoevOct 23, 2007 3:05 am 
Manlio PerilloOct 23, 2007 3:27 am 
Steve ChuOct 23, 2007 3:51 am 
Alejandro VartabedianOct 23, 2007 4:03 am 
Manlio PerilloOct 23, 2007 4:05 am 
Steve ChuOct 23, 2007 7:13 pm 
Yusuf GoolamabbasOct 24, 2007 1:01 am 
Igor SysoevOct 24, 2007 3:14 am 
Steve ChuOct 24, 2007 8:22 am 
Thomas SeifertOct 24, 2007 8:50 am 
Igor SysoevOct 30, 2007 1:11 am 
Manlio PerilloOct 30, 2007 4:35 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Is mod_php walking on its road?Actions...
From:Steve Chu (stvc@public.gmane.org)
Date:Oct 23, 2007 3:51:31 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

Sorry,all I made a mistake, nginx is using epoll, so blocked I/O will be a big problem. The same problem we meet when we write memcachedb(http://code.google.com/p/memcachedb/).

On 10/23/07, Manlio Perillo
<manlio_perillo-VGgt2q2+T+FeoW@public.gmane.org> wrote:

Igor Sysoev ha scritto:

On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:46:48AM +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote:

Igor Sysoev ha scritto:

On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 05:02:09PM +0800, Steve Chu wrote:

The threads are required thorough programming if you want production grade server, but not toy.

This is the reason why I'm writing mod_wsgi.

All the pure Python HTTP servers (with the exception of Twisted) are threads based. Indeed, I can only consider them as toys (with the exception, again, of Twisted).

I will add thread support only when I will be sure of what I'm doing. If possible, I would like to be able to handle threads in the Python application and not in mod_wsgi.